Young v. Holmes et al

Filing 217

ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBITS. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 4/10/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 EARL YOUNG, Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 09-01042 JSW ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBITS v. T. HOLMES, et al., 13 Defendants. / 14 15 16 The Court has received and considered the parties’ objections to the trial exhibits, and it HEREBY RULES as follows: 17 Defendants’ objections to trial exhibits 27-32, 254, 259-265 are OVERRULED. 18 Defendants’ objections to trial exhibit 255 are OVERRULED, and the redacted version 19 shall be admitted. 20 21 Defendants’ objections to trial exhibit 256 is OVERRULED AS MOOT, because the exhibit has been withdrawn. 22 Defendants’ objections to trial exhibits 257-258 are SUSTAINED. 23 Plaintiff’s objection to trial exhibit 40 is OVERRULED. Defendant’s redacted version 24 shall be admitted. 25 Plaintiff’s objection to trial exhibit 290 is OVERRULED. 26 The Court shall ADMIT Plaintiff’s proposed redacted version of trial exhibit 284. 27 Plaintiff’s objection to trial exhibit 275 is SUSTAINED. 28 // 1 The Court reserves ruling on Plaintiff’s objections to trial exhibits 100-107. 2 The Court reserves ruling on Defendants’ objections to trial exhibits 266-270. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: April 10, 2013 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?