Young v. Holmes et al
Filing
217
ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBITS. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 4/10/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
EARL YOUNG,
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 09-01042 JSW
ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO
EXHIBITS
v.
T. HOLMES, et al.,
13
Defendants.
/
14
15
16
The Court has received and considered the parties’ objections to the trial exhibits, and it
HEREBY RULES as follows:
17
Defendants’ objections to trial exhibits 27-32, 254, 259-265 are OVERRULED.
18
Defendants’ objections to trial exhibit 255 are OVERRULED, and the redacted version
19
shall be admitted.
20
21
Defendants’ objections to trial exhibit 256 is OVERRULED AS MOOT, because the
exhibit has been withdrawn.
22
Defendants’ objections to trial exhibits 257-258 are SUSTAINED.
23
Plaintiff’s objection to trial exhibit 40 is OVERRULED. Defendant’s redacted version
24
shall be admitted.
25
Plaintiff’s objection to trial exhibit 290 is OVERRULED.
26
The Court shall ADMIT Plaintiff’s proposed redacted version of trial exhibit 284.
27
Plaintiff’s objection to trial exhibit 275 is SUSTAINED.
28
//
1
The Court reserves ruling on Plaintiff’s objections to trial exhibits 100-107.
2
The Court reserves ruling on Defendants’ objections to trial exhibits 266-270.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated: April 10, 2013
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?