Young v. Holmes et al

Filing 56

WRIT of of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued for attendance of Plaintiff at settlement conference on June 1, 2011, at Solano State Prison. Signed by Judge Vadas on 5/4/11. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 EARL YOUNG, 13 v. 14 15 Case No. C 09-1042 JSW Plaintiff, ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM TO TRANSPORT PLAINTIFF EARL YOUNG, CDCR No. V-06022 T. HOLMES, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, EARL YOUNG, CDCR No. V-06022, a necessary and material witness in 19 proceedings in this case beginning on June 1, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., is confined at Kern Valley 20 State Prison, Delano, California, in the custody of the Warden. To secure this inmate’s 21 attendance at the settlement conference scheduled for June 1, 2011 at California State Prison, 22 Solano, it is necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum issue commanding the 23 custodian of EARL YOUNG, CDCR No. V-06022, to produce him at California State Prison, 24 Solano, 2100 Peabody Road, Vacaville, California 95687, the Honorable Nandor Vadas 25 presiding, beginning on June 1, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. 26 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that: 27 1. 28 A Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this Court, commanding the Warden of Kern Valley State Prison and the California Department of 1 Order & Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum Inmate Young (C 09-1042 JSW) 1 Corrections and Rehabilitation to produce inmate EARL YOUNG, CDCR No. V-06022, for a 2 settlement conference at California State Prison, Solano, at the time and place above, until 3 completion of the proceedings or as ordered by the Court, and thereafter to return the inmate to 4 Kern Valley State Prison. 5 2. The custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any change in custody of this inmate 6 and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. 7 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM 8 To: 9 YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce inmate EARL YOUNG, CDCR No. V-06022, for a The Warden of Kern Valley State Prison, 10 settlement conference at California State Prison, Solano, at the time and place above, until 11 completion of the proceedings or as ordered by the Court, and thereafter to return the inmate to 12 Kern Valley State Prison. R NIA ER H 20 __________________________ NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate as Judge J. Vad Nandor Judge RT 19 NO 18 May 4, 2011 Dated: ___________________________ 21 A 17 FO 16 C LI IT IS SO ORDERED. T TA RT U O 15 inmate and to provide the new custodian with a copy of this ES DISTRICT writ. S 14 FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the Court of any change in custody of this UNIT ED 13 N F D IS T IC T O R C 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Order & Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum Inmate Young (C 09-1042 JSW) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case Name: E. Young v. T. Holmes, et al. No. C 09-1042 JSW I hereby certify that on May 2, 2011, I electronically filed the following documents with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system: ORDER & WIRT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM TO TRANSPORT PLAINTIFF EARL YOUNG, CDCR No. V-06022 Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF system. I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered CM/ECF users. On May 2, 2011, I have mailed the foregoing document(s) by First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, or have dispatched it to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within three (3) calendar days to the following non-CM/ECF participants: Earl Young, V-06022 Kern Valley State Prison P.O. Box 5101 A-5/104 Delano, CA 93216 Pro Se I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on May 2, 2011, at San Francisco, California. D. Criswell Declarant 20444706.doc s/ D. Criswell Signature

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?