Hall v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 95

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 3/9/2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2011)

Download PDF
Hall v. City of Oakland et al Doc. 95 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 v. 13 CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., 14 15 16 The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of the 17 above-titled action and that the Oakland City Council has approved such settlement, 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims alleged herein be dismissed without 19 prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety 20 days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed 21 consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand 22 vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 9, 2011 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge Defendants. / LORENZO HALL, Plaintiff, No. C 09-1047 MMC ORDER OF DISMISSAL United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?