Memory Control Enterprise, LLC v. Symantec Corporation

Filing 68

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 7, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

SPENCER HOSIE (CA Bar No. 101777) [e-mail] BRUCE WECKER (CA Bar No. 078530) [e-mail] GEORGE F. BISHOP (CA Bar No. 89205) [e-mail] HOSIE RICE LLP 188 The Embarcadero, Suite 750 San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] RAYMOND P. NIRO (pro hace vice application to be filed) MATTHEW G. MCANDREWS (pro hace vice application to be filed) LEE F. GROSSMAN (pro hace vice application to be filed) TAHITI ARSULOWICZ (pro hace vice application to be filed) NIRO, SCAVONE, HALLER & NIRO 181 W. Madison St., Suite 4600 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff Memory Control Enterprise, LLC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION MEMORY CONTROL ENTERPRISE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SYMANTEC CORPORATION, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:09-CV-01063-MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF MEMORY CONTROL ENTERPRISE LLC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PURSUANT TO RULE 25(C), FED. R. CIV. P.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE

CASE NO. 3:09-CV-01063-MMC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The Court hereby grants plaintiff Memory Control Enterprise LLC's Unopposed Motion To Substitute Pursuant to Rule 25(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. Accordingly, it is: SO ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 25 (c), Fed. R. Civ. P., and the Stipulation of the parties, Southwest Technology Innovations, LLC, is substituted as plaintiff and counterdefendant in place of Memory Control Enterprise LLC in Civil Action No. 3:09-CV-01063 MMC (Memory Control Enterprise LLC v. Symantec Corporation) and that the new case caption shall be as follows: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SYMANTEC CORPORATION, Defendants. ) Case No. 3:09-CV-01063-MMC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

August 7, 2009 Date:_______________________

___________________________________ Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE

1

CASE NO. 3:09-CV-01063-MMC