Memory Control Enterprise, LLC v. Symantec Corporation

Filing 84

ORDER GRANTING 82 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2009)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP David A. Nelson (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] 2 Christopher Freeman (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] 3 Michael F. Harte (Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] 4 250 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 230 5 Chicago, IL 60601 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 7 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Sean S. Pak (Bar No. 219032) [e-mail] 8 Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. 203679) [e-mail] 9 Mary McNeill (Bar No. 261500) [e-mail] 10 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 11 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 13 Attorneys for Symantec Corporation 14 15 16 17 SOUTHWEST TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC, 18 Plaintiff, 19 vs. 20 SYMANTEC CORPORATION, 21 Defendant. 22 23 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CASE NO. 3:09-CV-01063-MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SYMANTEC CORPORATION'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS AND PRODUCE DOCUMENTS [PATENT LOCAL RULES 3-3 & 3-4]

On this date for consideration is Symantec Corporation's Unopposed Motion for an

25 Extension of Time to Serve Invalidity Contentions and Produce Documents, and the Court being 26 of the opinion same should be GRANTED, it is therefore 27 28
03869.30009/3113967.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SYMANTEC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

1

ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED, and the deadline whereby Symantec

2 Corporation must serve invalidity contentions and produce documents pursuant to Patent Local 3 Rules 3-3 and 3-4 is extended until November 16, 2009. 4 29th September 5 DATED THIS _____ day of ________________, 2009. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
03869.30009/3113967.1

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court Judge

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SYMANTEC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

-2-