Eller v. City of Santa Rosa et al

Filing 40

STIPULATION AND ORDER for a limited extension of the discovery cutoff date. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 04/05/10. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2010)

Download PDF
1 Steven B. Taxman (SBN 183394) Wesley Wakeford (SBN 224801) 2 John H. Scarpino (SBN 151377) 3 TAXMAN WAKEFORD 300 Montgomery Street, Suite 660 4 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 578-3510 5 Facsimile: (415) 294-2890 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 TROY ALAN ELLER 8 9 10 11 TAXMAN WAKEFORD NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LITIGATION ASSOCIATES 300 Montgomery Street, Suite 660 San Francisco, California 94104 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TROY ALAN ELLER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SANTA ROSA, a chartered city; SANTA ROSA POLICE DEPT., a police agency; KYLE PHILP, an individual and officer of the SANTA ROSA POLICE DEPT.; TOMMY ISACHSEN, an individual and officer of the SANTA ROSA POLICE DEPT.; SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, a California corporation; MARK DRAFTON, an individual; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants. STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A LIMITED EXTENSION OF THE DISCOVERY CUTOFF DATE Case No.: C 09-01094 TEH 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29 and Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff Troy 27 Alan Eller and Defendants City of Santa Rosa, Santa Rosa Police Department, Kyle Philp, 28 Tommy Isachsen each stipulate and request an extension of the Discovery Cutoff date for the limited purpose of permitting the parties to schedule one deposition beyond the March 29, 2010 STIPULATED ORDER FOR A LIMITED EXTENSION OF THE DISCOVERY CUTOFF DATE 1 2 discovery cutoff date. Specifically, the parties request an Order setting April 15, 2010 as the date 3 on which the parties must complete the deposition of Lieutenant Nolan, the person designated by 4 the Defendant Santa Rosa Police Department to testify on its behalf. All other non-expert 5 discovery will be completed by today, March 29, 2010, as specified in the Order for Pretrial Preparation. 6 Good cause exists to permit the parties to schedule this deposition beyond the March 29, 7 2010 discovery cutoff date, as follows: 8 9 10 11 TAXMAN WAKEFORD NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LITIGATION ASSOCIATES 300 Montgomery Street, Suite 660 San Francisco, California 94104 Lieutenant Nolan is Currently Out of the County and Unavailable for Deposition Until After the Close of Discovery on March 29, 2010: Plaintiff timely noticed the deposition of Defendant Santa Rosa Police Department for 12 March 26, 2010. The Santa Rosa Police Department, ("SRPD"), subsequently determined that Lieutenant Nolan is the person most knowledgeable to testify on its behalf on the topics 13 identified in the deposition notice. Lieutenant Nolan, however, could not be deposed on March 14 26, 2010 because he was out of the county on a previously scheduled vacation. Officer Nolan is 15 not scheduled to return from vacation until April 9, 2010. (Wesley Decl. ¶ 3.) As a result, 16 Officer Nolan is not available for deposition until after the March 29. 2010 discovery cutoff date. 17 Defendant SRPD timely notified Plaintiff of these facts. In response, Plaintiff and the 18 SRPD conferred, and mutually agreed to seek a stipulated order permitting the parties to schedule 19 Lieutenant Nolan's deposition on a date after the discovery cutoff date, but no later than April 15, 2010. (Wesley Decl. ¶ 4.) 20 Good cause exists for permitting a limited extension of the discovery cutoff date for the 21 sole purpose of allowing the parties to schedule Lieutenant Nolan's deposition after March 29, 22 2010, By allowing the parties to schedule Lieutenant Nolan's deposition as requested, the parties 23 are assured that the person most knowledgeable will in fact be the person designated to testify on 24 behalf of the SRPD. This will also avoid the costly necessity of designating another individual to 25 testify on behalf of the SRPD, who will need time to become educated and knowledgeable on 26 these topics ­ a situation all parties wish to avoid. Consequently, the parties agree and stipulate to request an Order permitting the parties to schedule Lieutenant Nolan's deposition on a date 27 after the discovery cutoff date, but before April 15, 2010. (Wesley Decl. ¶ 5.) 28 STIPULATED ORDER FOR A LIMITED EXTENSION OF THE DISCOVERY CUTOFF DATE 1 The undersigned attorneys of record for the various parties to this action each certify that stipulation to extend the discovery cutoff date for the limited purpose of scheduling the 2 they are fully authorized by the party or parties represented to agree to and enter into this 3 4 deposition of Lieutenant Nolan on a date beyond the March 29, 2010 discovery cutoff date. 5 Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court approve and enter this Stipulation for a limited extension of the discovery cutoff date from March 29, 2010 to April 15, 2010 for the 6 limited purpose of taking depositions of Lieutenant Nolan. 7 8 9 Dated: March 29, 2010 10 11 TAXMAN WAKEFORD NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LITIGATION ASSOCIATES 300 Montgomery Street, Suite 660 San Francisco, California 94104 TAXMAN WAKEFORD 12 13 14 15 16 Dated: March 29, 2010 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 By: Wesley Wakeford Attorneys for Plaintiff Troy A. Eller OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By: John J. Fritsch Attorney for Defendants City of Santa Rosa, Santa Rosa Police Department, Kyle Philp and Tommy Isachsen PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 DATED: 28 04/05/10 UNIT ED 24 S S DISTRICT TE C TA C OF D I S T I C TDATE STIPULATED ORDER FOR A LIMITED EXTENSION OF THE DISCOVERY CUTOFF R N ER A LI FO Honorable Theldon E. Henderson nderson e lton E. H United Stated DistrictThe Judge udge Court J R NIA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?