Carrethers v. Bay Area Rapid Transit et al
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MIL #1. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/17/2011. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2011)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C-09-1101 EMC
BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, et al.,
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN
In the Court's Final Pretrial Conference Order, Docket No. 80, the Court stated the following
in ruling on Plaintiff's Motion in Limine #1:
In their first motion, Plaintiff asks the Court to exclude any evidence of Plaintiff’s
prior arrests, convictions, and previous drug and alcohol use. Defendants do not
oppose the motion, although they would seek to introduce it as rebuttal “should
Plaintiff introduce evidence, in whatever form, affirmatively suggesting the absence
of a prior history of arrests, convictions and drug and alcohol use.” Opp. at 1. The
Court therefore GRANTS the motion to exclude this evidence, although it will not
bar Plaintiffs from moving to introduce the evidence if Defendants open the door to
The Court hereby clarifies that the last sentence should state, "The Court therefore GRANTS the
motion to exclude this evidence, although it will not bar Defendants from moving to introduce the
evidence if Plaintiff opens the door to such evidence."
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 17, 2011
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?