ATS Claim, LLC v. Epson Electronics America, Inc. et al

Filing 149

ORDER: Further Case Management Conference set for 8/3/2012 02:30 AM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 7/16/12., Motions terminated: (148 in 3:09-cv-01115-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULA TION AND ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corporation America, (383 in 3:09-cv-05840-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE file d by AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., (198 in 3:10-cv-00117-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronic s Corporation America, (187 in 3:10-cv-04572-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corporation America, (257 in 3:10-cv-01064-SI) STIPULAT ION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., (248 in 3:10-cv-04945-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION AND O RDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., (290 in 3:09-cv-04997-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE fi led by AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, (71 in 3:10-cv-05452-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronic s Corporation America, Inc., (177 in 3:09-cv-05609-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., (180 in 3:11-cv-0 0058-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corporation America, ( 6144 in 3:07-md-01827-SI) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CHRISTOPHER A. NEDEAU (SBN 81297) CARL L. BLUMENSTEIN (SBN 124158) JAMES A. NICKOVICH (SBN 244969) NOSSAMAN LLP 50 California Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 398-3600 Facsimile: (415) 398-2438 cnedeau@nossaman.com cblumenstein@nossaman.com Attorneys for Defendants AUO Optronics Corporation and AUO Optronics Corporation America 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI MDL No. 1827 This Document Relates To: ATS Claim, LLC v. Epson Electronics, America, Inc., et al., Case No. 09-cv-1115 STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 09-cv-4997 Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-4572 Costco Wholesale Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 11-cv-0058 Dell Inc. et al. v. Sharp Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-1064 Eastman Kodak Company v. Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-5452 Electrograph Systems, Inc., et al. v. Epson Imaging Devices Corp., et al., Case No. 10-cv-0117 Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 09-cv-5840 Nokia Corp. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 09-cv-5609 Target Corp. et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-4945 270492_1.DOC -1- Case No. 3:07-MD-1827 SI STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 WHEREAS the above-captioned cases have been proceeding with pretrial preparation in 2 accordance with the Court’s Orders dated November 23, 2010 and July 14, 2011 (Dkt. Nos. 2165, 3 3110) and some of those cases are scheduled for trial before this Court on November 5, 2012; 4 WHEREAS counsel for plaintiffs and counsel for defendants in the above-captioned cases 5 believe it would be helpful to convene a case management conference and counsel are available for 6 such a status conference on Friday, August 3, 2012 at 2:30 p.m.; 7 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between liaison counsel for the above- 8 captioned plaintiffs and defendants’ liaison counsel, and subject to the concurrence of the Court, 9 that a case management conference will be held on Friday, August 3, 2012 at 2:30 p.m. in 10 Courtroom 10 of the Federal Building located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, 11 California. The parties will file case management conference statements by no later than July 23, 12 2012. 13 14 Dated: July 12, 2012 NOSSAMAN LLP By: 15 /s/ Carl L. Blumenstein Carl L. Blumenstein 16 Liaison Counsel for Defendants and Attorneys for Defendants AUO Optronics Corporation and AUO Optronics Corporation America 17 18 19 Dated: July 12, 2012 20 CROWELL & MORING LLP By: 21 /s/ Jerome Murphy Jerome Murphy Liaison Counsel for Direct Action Plaintiffs and Attorneys for AT&T Mobility LLC, Motorola, Inc., and Target Corp. 22 23 24 25 26 ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories. 27 28 270492_1.DOC -2- Case No. 3:07-MD-1827 SI STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 7/16/12 The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Court Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 270492_1.DOC -3- Case No. 3:07-MD-1827 SI STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?