ATS Claim, LLC v. Epson Electronics America, Inc. et al

Filing 61

ORDER re: briefing schedule (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-01115-SI Document60 Filed09/01/09 Page1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Michael R. Lazerwitz (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Jeremy J. Calsyn (State Bar No. 205062) Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756) CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP 2000 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 974-1500 (Phone) (202) 974-1999 (Facsimile) mlazerwitz@cgsh.com Attorneys for Defendant LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC. David P. Germaine (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) VANEK, VICKERS & MASINI 111 South Wacker Drive, Suite 4050 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (213) 224-1500 (Phone) (213) 224-1510 dgermaine@vaneklaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff ATS CLAIM, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION No. M 07-1827 SI-FS This Document Relates To: Case No.: 09-1115 SI ATS Claim, LLC Plaintiff, vs. Epson Electronics America, Inc.; Hitachi Ltd.; Hitachi Displays Ltd.; Hitachi Electronics Devices (USA), Inc.; Sharp Corp.; Sharp Electronics Corp.; Toshiba Corp.; Toshiba Electronic Components, Inc.; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.; Toshiba Matsushita Display 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS ATS CLAIM, LLC'S COMPLAINT Honorable Susan Illston JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS ATS CLAIM, LLC'S COMPLAINT Case No.: 09-1115 SI Related To Case No.: M 07-1827 SI-FS Case3:09-cv-01115-SI Document60 Filed09/01/09 Page2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Technology Co., Ltd.; LG Display Co., Ltd.; LG Display America, Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; AU Optronics Corp.; AU Optronics Corp. America; Chi Mei Corp.; Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.; Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co., Ltd.; Nexgen Mediatech, Inc.; Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc.; Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd.; Tatung Company of America, Inc.; and Hannstar Display Corp., Defendants. The undersigned parties respectfully request that the following order be entered to modify the timing of the parties' respective opposition and replies with regard to LG Display America, Inc.'s ("LG Display America") motion to dismiss ATS Claim, LLC's ("ATS") complaint (the "Motion"), which the undersigned defendants joined. WHEREAS, on August 26, 2009, the presentation of the motion was continued until September 29, 2009; WHEREAS, the parties desire additional time before the rescheduled presentation of the motion to prepare and submit their briefing; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties, acting by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. 2. 22, 2009. 3. Except as set forth above, all Local Rules shall remain in effect with respect to ATS's opposition shall be due on or before September 11, 2009. The undersigned defendants' replies shall remain due on or before September the briefing on the motions. 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS ATS CLAIM, LLC'S COMPLAINT Case No.: 09-1115 SI Related To Case No.: M 07-1827 SI-FS Case3:09-cv-01115-SI Document60 Filed09/01/09 Page3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, DATED: September 1, 2009 By: /s/ David P. Germaine David P. Germaine VANEK, VICKERS & MASINI 111 South Wacker Drive, Suite 4050 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (213) 224-1500 (Phone) (213) 224-1510 dgermaine@vaneklaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff ATS Claim, LLC Admitted Pro Hac Vice pursuant to Paragraph 9 of Pretrial Order No. 1 (Docket No. 180, 07-1827(SI)) (July 3, 2007) By: /s/ Michael R. Lazerwitz Michael R. Lazerwitz (PRO HAC VICE) Jeremy J. Calsyn (State Bar No. 205062) Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756) CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP 2000 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 974-1500 (Phone) (202) 974-1999 (Facsimile) mlazerwitz@cgsh.com Attorneys for Defendant LG Display America, Inc. By:/s/ Bryan B. Barnhart Bryan B. Barnhart Christopher A. Nedeau Carl L. Blumenstein Nossaman LLP Attorneys for Defendant AU Optronics Corporation America 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS ATS CLAIM, LLC'S COMPLAINT Case No.: 09-1115 SI Related To Case No.: M 07-1827 SI-FS Case3:09-cv-01115-SI Document60 Filed09/01/09 Page4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By:/s/ Wayne A. Cross Wayne A. Cross (pro hac vice) John H. Chung (pro hac vice) Kristen J. McAhren (pro hac vice) WHITE & CASE LLP 1155 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Telephone:(212) 819-8200 Facsimile: (212) 354-8113 Attorneys for Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. By: /s/ Jacob R. Sorensen Jacob R. Sorensen John M. Grenfell Fusae Nara Ryan K. Takemoto PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 50 Fremont Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Attorneys for Defendant Sharp Electronics Corporation By: /s/ Kent M. Roger Kent M. Roger (State Bar No. 95987) MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: (415) 442-1000 Fax: (415) 442-1001 Attorneys for Defendant Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS ATS CLAIM, LLC'S COMPLAINT Case No.: 09-1115 SI Related To Case No.: M 07-1827 SI-FS Case3:09-cv-01115-SI Document60 Filed09/01/09 Page5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 By: /s/ Steven F. Cherry Steven F. Cherry (pro hac vice) Gordon Pearson (pro hac vice) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20006-3642 Telephone: (202) 663-6000 Facsimile: (202) 663-6363 Steven.Cherry@wilmerhale.com Godon.Pearson@wilmerhale.com Attorneys for Defendant Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc. and Nexgen Mediatech USA Inc. ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that 13 the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS ATS CLAIM, LLC'S COMPLAINT Case No.: 09-1115 SI Related To Case No.: M 07-1827 SI-FS Dated: September 1, 2009 By: /s/ Michael R. Lazerwitz Michael R. Lazerwitz IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _____________________ ______________________________________ HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case3:09-cv-01115-SI Document60-1 Filed09/01/09 Page1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-01115-SI Document60-1 Filed09/01/09 Page2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?