Bender v. Micrel Incorporated

Filing 42

ORDER re 37 . (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2010)

Case3:09-cv-01144-SI Document37

Filed12/18/09 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

MARK E. MILLER (S.B. # 130200) [e-mail] ANNE E. HUFFSMITH (S.B. # 236438) [e-mail] O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3823 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.984.8701 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant MICREL, INC. David N. Kuhn (State Bar #73389) Attorney-at-Law 144 Hagar Avenue Piedmont, CA 94611 Telephone: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] Attorney for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant GREGORY BENDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

GREGORY BENDER, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, v.

Case No. C09-01144 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

20 MICREL, INC., 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C09-01144 SI

Defendant and Counterclaimant.

Case3:09-cv-01144-SI Document37

Filed12/18/09 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS the deadline for Micrel, Inc. to serve Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 Disclosures is currently set for December 21, 2009 (D.E. 29); WHEREAS Micrel's Motion to Strike or Compel Patent L.R. 3-1 Compliant Infringement Contentions is currently pending and will not be heard until February 12, 2010 (D.E. 30 and 36); THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), the parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE that the deadline for Micrel to serve Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 Disclosures is the later of (a) 45 days after Bender serves infringement contentions that comply with Patent L.R. 3-1, OR (b) 14 days after the Court decides Micrel's Motion To Strike or Compel Compliant Infringement Contentions. The subsequent Patent Local Rules deadlines will follow from the modified Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 deadline. The declaration required by Civil Local Rule 6-2(a) is attached. (See Huffsmith Declaration.) Respectfully submitted, Dated: December 18, 2009 By: /s/ Mark E. Miller Mark E. Miller O'Melveny & Myers LLP Counsel for Defendant and Counterclaimant MICREL, INC. /s/ David N. Kuhn David N. Kuhn Attorney-at-Law Counsel for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant GREGORY BENDER

Dated: December 18, 2009 By:

Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above-listed signatories. Respectfully submitted, Dated: December 18, 2009 By: /s/ Anne E. Huffsmith Anne E. Huffsmith O'Melveny & Myers LLP Counsel for Defendant and Counterclaimant MICREL, INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: _________________________ _____________________________________ The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge -2CASE NO. C09-01144 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER