Bender v. Micrel Incorporated
ORDER re 37 . (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2010)
Filed12/18/09 Page1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
MARK E. MILLER (S.B. # 130200) email@example.com ANNE E. HUFFSMITH (S.B. # 236438) firstname.lastname@example.org O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3823 Telephone: 415.984.8700 Facsimile: 415.984.8701 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant MICREL, INC. David N. Kuhn (State Bar #73389) Attorney-at-Law 144 Hagar Avenue Piedmont, CA 94611 Telephone: (510) 653-4983 E-mail: email@example.com Attorney for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant GREGORY BENDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
GREGORY BENDER, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, v.
Case No. C09-01144 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
20 MICREL, INC., 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C09-01144 SI
Defendant and Counterclaimant.
Filed12/18/09 Page2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
WHEREAS the deadline for Micrel, Inc. to serve Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 Disclosures is currently set for December 21, 2009 (D.E. 29); WHEREAS Micrel's Motion to Strike or Compel Patent L.R. 3-1 Compliant Infringement Contentions is currently pending and will not be heard until February 12, 2010 (D.E. 30 and 36); THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), the parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE that the deadline for Micrel to serve Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 Disclosures is the later of (a) 45 days after Bender serves infringement contentions that comply with Patent L.R. 3-1, OR (b) 14 days after the Court decides Micrel's Motion To Strike or Compel Compliant Infringement Contentions. The subsequent Patent Local Rules deadlines will follow from the modified Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 deadline. The declaration required by Civil Local Rule 6-2(a) is attached. (See Huffsmith Declaration.) Respectfully submitted, Dated: December 18, 2009 By: /s/ Mark E. Miller Mark E. Miller O'Melveny & Myers LLP Counsel for Defendant and Counterclaimant MICREL, INC. /s/ David N. Kuhn David N. Kuhn Attorney-at-Law Counsel for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant GREGORY BENDER
Dated: December 18, 2009 By:
Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above-listed signatories. Respectfully submitted, Dated: December 18, 2009 By: /s/ Anne E. Huffsmith Anne E. Huffsmith O'Melveny & Myers LLP Counsel for Defendant and Counterclaimant MICREL, INC.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: _________________________ _____________________________________ The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge -2CASE NO. C09-01144 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?