Bender v. Broadcom Corporation

Filing 11

STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time to and including 9/15/2009 for defendant to file responsive pleading to amended complaint; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 8/6/2009. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2009)

Case3:09-cv-01147-MHP Document10

Filed08/03/09 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Christopher Parry (State Bar No. 209858) Broadcom Corporation 190 Mathilda Place Sunnyvale, CA 94086 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorney for Defendant BROADCOM CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION GREGORY BENDER, Plaintiff, v. BROADCOM CORPORATION, Defendant. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, through their counsel, that Defendant shall have to and including September 15, 2009 to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint. This extension will not alter an event or deadline already set by the Court. Dated: August 3, 2009 By: _______/s/____________________ David N. Kuhn (State Bar No. 73389) Attorney for Plaintiff GREGORY BENDER Respectfully submitted, By: _______/s/____________________ Christopher Parry (State Bar No. 209858) Attorney for Defendant BROADCOM CORPORATION STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 3 Case No. 5:09-cv-1147 (MHP)

Stipulation Regarding Extension of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint

1 Case No. 5:09-cv-1147 (MHP)

Case3:09-cv-01147-MHP Document10

Filed08/03/09 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

I, Christopher Parry, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation Regarding Extension of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that David N. Kuhn has concurred in this filing.

Dated: August 3, 2009

By: _______/s/____________________ Christopher Parry Attorney for Defendant BROADCOM CORPORATION

UNIT ED

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation Regarding Extension of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

D IS T IC T R

OF

2 Case No. 5:09-cv-1147 (MHP)

A

C

LI

FO

arilyn Judge M

l H. Pate

R NIA

O OR IT IS S

DERED

RT U O

NO

RT

H