Bender v. Broadcom Corporation

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER extending deadline to serve patent disclosures and responsive pleadings to 4/8/2010; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 2/11/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DARIN W. SNYDER (State Bar #136003), dsnyder@omm.com ANNE E. HUFFSMITH (State Bar #236438), ahuffsmith@omm.com O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3823 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 Attorneys for Defendant BROADCOM CORPORATION David N. Kuhn (State Bar #73389) Attorney-at-Law 144 Hagar Avenue Piedmont, CA 94611 Telephone: (510) 653-4983 E-mail: dnkuhn@pacbell.net Attorney for Plaintiff GREGORY BENDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION GREGORY BENDER, Plaintiff, v. BROADCOM CORPORATION, Defendant. Case No. 3:09-cv-1147 (MHP) CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2(a) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WHEREAS Plaintiff Gregory Bender served his revised Patent Local Rule 3-1 infringement contentions on February 1, 2010; WHEREAS Defendant Broadcom Corporation contests the sufficiency of Bender's infringement contentions; WHEREAS Broadcom and Bender need additional time to meet and confer regarding Broadcom's objections to Bender's infringement contentions; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:09-CV-1147 (MHP) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS Broadcom's Patent Local Rule 3-3 and 3-4 disclosures and response to Bender's complaint are currently due on February 18, 2010; THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), the parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE that the deadline for Broadcom to serve its Patent Local Rule 3-3 and 3-4 disclosures and to respond to Bender's complaint shall be extended by 49 days, until April 8, 2010, to allow the parties additional time to resolve their disagreement regarding the sufficiency of Bender's infringement contentions and to allow Broadcom sufficient time to file and have heard a motion to compel Rule 3-1 compliant infringement contentions if necessary. The Patent Local Rule 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, and 4-4 deadlines will follow from the modified Patent Local Rule 3-3 and 3-4 deadline. The declaration required by Civil Local Rule 6-2(a) is attached. (See Huffsmith Declaration.) Respectfully submitted, Dated: February 10, 2010 By: /s/ Darin W. Snyder Darin W. Snyder O'Melveny & Myers LLP Counsel for Defendant BROADCOM CORPORATION By: /s/ David N. Kuhn David N. Kuhn Attorney-at-Law Counsel for Plaintiff GREGORY BENDER Dated: February 10, 2010 Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above-listed signatories. Respectfully submitted, Dated: February 10, 2010 By: /s/ Anne E. Huffsmith Anne E. Huffsmith O'Melveny & Myers LLP Counsel for Defendant BROADCOM CORPORATION UNIT ED S PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED: S DISTRICT TE C TA 2/11/2010 Dated: _________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER N OF A -2- CASE NO. 3:09-CV-1147 (MHP) ER C LI FO O _____________________________________ IT IS S The Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel United States District Judge tel n H . Pa e Marily Judg NO ED ORDER R NIA RT U O RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?