Mariolle v. Volvo Group North America Inc. et al

Filing 278

AMENDED CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Raymond P. Mariolle, Regina Lynn Mariolle against Amsted Industires Incorporated, Amsted Industries, Inc., Consolidated Metco, Inc., Volvo Group North America Inc., Volvo Group North America, Inc., Wittke Wa ste Equipment. Plaintiffs Raymond P. Mariolle and Regina Mariolle shall have judgment against defendants Volvo Trucks North America, Inc.; Consolidated Metco, Inc.; Amsted Industries, Inc.; and Wittke Waste Equipment in the amounts set forth in the Special Verdict Form filed on May 21, 2012. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2012) Modified on 9/4/2012 (tlS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 RAYMOND P. MARIOLLE and REGINA MARIOLLE, No. CV-09-1209 MMC No. CV-09-4250 MMC 7 Plaintiffs, 8 AMENDED v. 9 10 11 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; CONSOLIDATED METCO, INC.; AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC.; and WITTKE WASTE EQUIPMENT, 12 Defendants. 13 / 14 (X) Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues 15 have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiffs Raymond P. Mariolle 18 and Regina Mariolle shall have judgment against defendants Volvo Trucks North 19 America, Inc.; Consolidated Metco, Inc.; Amsted Industries, Inc.; and Wittke Waste 20 Equipment in the amounts set forth in the Special Verdict Form filed on May 21, 2012. 21 22 23 Dated: September 4, 2012 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk 24 25 By: Tracy Lucero Deputy Clerk 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?