Mariolle v. Volvo Group North America Inc. et al
Filing
278
AMENDED CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Raymond P. Mariolle, Regina Lynn Mariolle against Amsted Industires Incorporated, Amsted Industries, Inc., Consolidated Metco, Inc., Volvo Group North America Inc., Volvo Group North America, Inc., Wittke Wa ste Equipment. Plaintiffs Raymond P. Mariolle and Regina Mariolle shall have judgment against defendants Volvo Trucks North America, Inc.; Consolidated Metco, Inc.; Amsted Industries, Inc.; and Wittke Waste Equipment in the amounts set forth in the Special Verdict Form filed on May 21, 2012. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2012) Modified on 9/4/2012 (tlS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
RAYMOND P. MARIOLLE and REGINA
MARIOLLE,
No. CV-09-1209 MMC
No. CV-09-4250 MMC
7
Plaintiffs,
8
AMENDED
v.
9
10
11
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, INC.;
CONSOLIDATED METCO, INC.; AMSTED
INDUSTRIES, INC.; and WITTKE WASTE
EQUIPMENT,
12
Defendants.
13
/
14
(X) Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues
15
have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiffs Raymond P. Mariolle
18
and Regina Mariolle shall have judgment against defendants Volvo Trucks North
19
America, Inc.; Consolidated Metco, Inc.; Amsted Industries, Inc.; and Wittke Waste
20
Equipment in the amounts set forth in the Special Verdict Form filed on May 21, 2012.
21
22
23
Dated: September 4, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
24
25
By: Tracy Lucero
Deputy Clerk
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?