Mariolle v. Volvo Group North America Inc. et al

Filing 300

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF REPLY MEMORANDUM RE: REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 58(D). The reply memorandum to the request for entry of second amended judgment, if any, is due November 19, 2012 if final settlement is not reached. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 22, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2012)

1 ANN M. ASIANO (SBN 094891)
MICHAEL A. KING (SBN 077014)
2 BRADLEY, CURLEY, ASIANO,
BARRABEE, ABEL & KOWALSKI, P.C.
3 1100 Larkspur Landing Circle, Suite 200
Larkspur, CA 94939
4 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
5
Attorneys for Defendants
6 WITTKE WASTE EQUIPMENT,
LABRIE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, and
7 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO
RAYMOND MARIOLLE,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16

CASE NO. C-09-1209 MMC (MEJ)

vs.
VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA,
INC.; CONSOLIDATED METCO, INC.;
AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC.; WITTKE
WASTE EQUIPMENT, LABRIE
ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, FEDERAL
SIGNAL CORPORATION,

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
SUBMISSION OF REPLY
MEMORANDUM RE: REQUEST FOR
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO
FRCP 58(d)

Defendants.

17
18

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, good cause appearing, based upon settlement of all matters

19

20 between Plaintiffs RAYMOND MARIOLLE and REGINA MARIOLLE and Defendants
21 WITTKE WASTE EQUIPMENT, LABRIE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, and FEDERAL
22 SIGNAL CORPORATION, that Defendants have an additional 30 days to file their reply
23 memorandum re: Request for Entry of Second Amended Judgment, after which time the court will
24 make its ruling. The Reply Memorandum will now be due no later than November 19, 2012, if
25 final settlement is not reached.
26 Date:

_______________________________
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

October 22, 2012

27
28
29
30

-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF REPLY MEMORANDUM
RE: REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. C-09-1209 MMC (MEJ)