Mariolle v. Volvo Group North America Inc. et al

Filing 304

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE ALL DEADLINES REGARDING DEFENDANT VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, INC.'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT. All deadlines related to the motion are continued for 45 days. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 30, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2012)

1 ANTHONY E. SONNETT, SB# 163182
E-Mail: [e-mail]
2 TREVOR J. INGOLD, SB# 193227
E-Mail: [e-mail]
3 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
221 N. Figueroa Street, Suite 1200
4 Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone:
213.250.1800
213.250.7900
5 Facsimile:
6 Attorneys for Defendant
VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10
11 RAYMOND P. MARIOLLE,
12
13

Plaintiff,
vs.

14 VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC.;
CONSOLIDATED METCO, INC.; AMSTED
15 INDUSTRIES, INC.; LABRIE
ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP; WITTKE
16 WASTE EQUIPMENT; FEDERAL SIGNAL
CORPORATION; AND DOES 1 through 25,
17 inclusive, ,
18

CASE NO. 3:09-cv-1209 MMC
3:09-cv-4250 MMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE ALL
DEADLINES REGARDING DEFENDANT
VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA,
INC.’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR STAY
OF ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT

Defendant.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

LEWIS

BRISBOIS

BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, based upon the pending settlement of
all matters before this Court and on Appeal between plaintiffs RAYMOND MARIOLLE and
REGINA MARIOLLE (“Plaintiffs”) and defendant VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
(“VTNA”), that with the Court’s permission, all deadlines related to VTNA’s Ex Parte Motion for
Stay of Enforcement of the Judgment be continued for 45 days. This stipulation is made on the
grounds that Plaintiffs and VTNA expect to have their settlement finalized within the next 45
4816-6736-3345.1

3:09-cv-1209 MMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE ALL DEADLINES RE: DEFENDANT’S EX
PARTE MOTION FOR STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT

1 days, which will make the current ex parte motion before the Court moot.
2

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

3 DATED: October 30, 2012

BOXER & GERSON LLP

4
5

By: /s/ Gary B. Roth
Gary B. Roth
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
RAYMOND MARIOLLE and REGINA
MARIOLLE

6
7
8
9 DATED: October 30, 2012

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH

10

LLP

11
12

By: /s/ Anthony E. Sonnett
Anthony E. Sonnett
Trevor J. Ingold
Attorneys for Defendant
VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, INC.

13
14
15

[PROPOSED] ORDER

16
17
18 IT IS SO ORDERED.
19

October 30, 2012
20 DATED: ___________________________
21

_____________________________________
Judge of the Superior Court
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27

LEWIS

BRISBOIS

BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

28
4816-6736-3345.1

3:09-cv-1209 MMC
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE ALL DEADLINES RE: DEFENDANT’S EX
PARTE MOTION FOR STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT