Mariolle v. Volvo Group North America Inc. et al
Filing
309
ORDER GRANTING FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF REPLY MEMORANDUM RE: REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 58(d). The reply memorandum is due no later than December 19, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 16, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ANN M. ASIANO (SBN 094891)
MICHAEL A. KING (SBN 077014)
BRADLEY, CURLEY, ASIANO,
BARRABEE, ABEL & KOWALSKI, P.C.
1100 Larkspur Landing Circle, Suite 200
Larkspur, CA 94939
Telephone: (415) 464-8888
Facsimile: (415) 464-8887
Attorneys for Defendants
WITTKE WASTE EQUIPMENT,
LABRIE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, and
FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION
8
9
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO
RAYMOND MARIOLLE,
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
CASE NO. C-09-1209 MMC (MEJ)
Plaintiff,
vs.
VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA,
INC.; CONSOLIDATED METCO, INC.;
AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC.; WITTKE
WASTE EQUIPMENT, LABRIE
ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, FEDERAL
SIGNAL CORPORATION,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
SUBMISSION OF REPLY
MEMORANDUM RE: REQUEST FOR
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO
FRCP 58(d)
Defendants.
18
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, good cause appearing, based upon settlement of all matters
20
between Plaintiffs RAYMOND MARIOLLE and REGINA MARIOLLE and Defendants
21
WITTKE WASTE EQUIPMENT, LABRIE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, and FEDERAL
22
SIGNAL CORPORATION, that Defendants have an additional 30 days to file their reply
23
memorandum re: Request for Entry of Second Amended Judgment, after which time the court will
24
make its ruling. The Reply Memorandum will now be due no later than December 19, 2012.
25
26
Date: November 16, 2012
_______________________________
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
27
28
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF REPLY MEMORANDUM
RE: REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. C-09-1209 MMC (MEJ)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?