Mariolle v. Volvo Group North America Inc. et al

Filing 309

ORDER GRANTING FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF REPLY MEMORANDUM RE: REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 58(d). The reply memorandum is due no later than December 19, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 16, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ANN M. ASIANO (SBN 094891) MICHAEL A. KING (SBN 077014) BRADLEY, CURLEY, ASIANO, BARRABEE, ABEL & KOWALSKI, P.C. 1100 Larkspur Landing Circle, Suite 200 Larkspur, CA 94939 Telephone: (415) 464-8888 Facsimile: (415) 464-8887 Attorneys for Defendants WITTKE WASTE EQUIPMENT, LABRIE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, and FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO RAYMOND MARIOLLE, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 CASE NO. C-09-1209 MMC (MEJ) Plaintiff, vs. VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC.; CONSOLIDATED METCO, INC.; AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC.; WITTKE WASTE EQUIPMENT, LABRIE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF REPLY MEMORANDUM RE: REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 58(d) Defendants. 18 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, good cause appearing, based upon settlement of all matters 20 between Plaintiffs RAYMOND MARIOLLE and REGINA MARIOLLE and Defendants 21 WITTKE WASTE EQUIPMENT, LABRIE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, and FEDERAL 22 SIGNAL CORPORATION, that Defendants have an additional 30 days to file their reply 23 memorandum re: Request for Entry of Second Amended Judgment, after which time the court will 24 make its ruling. The Reply Memorandum will now be due no later than December 19, 2012. 25 26 Date: November 16, 2012 _______________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 27 28 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF REPLY MEMORANDUM RE: REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. C-09-1209 MMC (MEJ)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?