Mariolle v. Volvo Group North America Inc. et al

Filing 43

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE AND AMENDING PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Non-expert discovery cutoff 11/19/2010. Designation of experts 12/10/2010; rebuttal 12/28/2010. Expert discovery cutoff 1/14/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 1/28/2011. Pretrial Co nference set for 4/19/2011 3:00 PM. Jury Trial set for 5/2/2011 9:00 AM. Status Conference set for 2/4/2011 10:30 AM, joint statement due by 1/28/2011. The parties' joint request for an order affording plaintiffs leave to amend is granted, conditioned on plaintiffs' filing their respective amended complaints no later than May 21, 2010 and serving Labrie no later than June 18, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 11, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Anthony E. Sonnett (SBN 163182) Trevor J. Ingold (SBN 193227) Matt F. Cohen (SBN 261275) SONNETT INGOLD 333 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 3550 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 628-2200 Facsimile: (213) 628-2221 Attorneys for Defendant VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO RAYMOND P. MARIOLLE, Plaintiff, v. VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC.; CONSOLIDATED METCO, INC; AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC.; AND DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. C-09-1209-MMC (MEJ) CASE NO. C-09-4250-MMC (MEJ) [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE AND AMENDING PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER Current Trial Date: October 12, 2010 WHEREAS, the current trial date for Case No. C-09-1209 and related Case No. C-09-4250 is October 12, 2010; WHEREAS, the final Pretrial Conference is currently set for September 28, 2010. WHEREAS, the expert disclosure deadline is currently set for May 21, 2010, and the expert discovery cutoff date is currently set for June 25, 2010; WHEREAS, the parties have stipulated and agreed to continue the trial date six months and amend the Court's October 9, 2009 Pretrial Preparation Order in [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE AND AMENDING PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 accordance therewith, and for good cause shown; The current trial date is hereby continued, and the Court's Pretrial Preparation Order is amended as follows: May 2, 2011 9:00 a.m. JURY TRIAL DATE: _____________________ at ________, Courtroom 7, 19th floor. November 19, 2010 NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: ________________. DESIGNATION OF EXPERTS: December 10, 2010 Plaintiff/Defendant: No later than _________________. December 28, 2010 Plaintiff/Defendant: Rebuttal no later than _______________. January 14, 2011 EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:_____________________. January 28, 2011 DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS shall be filed no later than _____________, and shall be noticed for hearing 35 days thereafter April 19, 2011 3:00 p.m PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE:_____________________ at _______. MEET AND CONFER (Civil L.R. 16-10(b)(5): Lead trial counsel shall meet and March 14, 2011 confer no later than _______________________. FURTHER STATUS CONFERENCE:_____________________ at 10:30 a.m. ______. February 4, 2011 January 28, 2011 FURTHER STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT DUE: ________________. [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE AND AMENDING PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ADDITIONAL ORDERS: The parties' joint request for an order affording plaintiffs leave to amend their respective pleadings to add Labrie as a defendant is hereby GRANTED, conditioned on plaintiffs' filing their respective amended complaints no later than May 21, 2010 and serving Labrie no later than June 18, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. May 11, 2010 DATED: _____________ ___________________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE AND AMENDING PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?