Bender v. Nokia Inc.

Filing 43

ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued from March 19, 2010 to May 7, 2010. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than April 30, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 15, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Greg L. Lippetz (State Bar No. 154228) glippetz@jonesday.com Cora L. Schmid (State Bar No. 237267) cschmid@jonesday.com JONES DAY 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: 650-739-3939 Facsimile: 650-739-3900 Attorneys for Defendant Nokia Inc. David N. Kuhn (State Bar No. 73389) Attorney-at-Law 144 Hagar Avenue Piedmont, CA 94611 Telephone: (510) 653-4983 E-mail: dnkuhn@pacbell.net Attorney for plaintiff Gregory Bender UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Gregory Bender, Plaintiff, v. Nokia Inc., Defendant. Case No. C09-01247 MMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-2(e), Defendant Nokia Inc. ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Gregory Bender ("Plaintiff") through their respective counsel, hereby request the Court change the date for the Further Case Management Conference currently scheduled for March 19, 2010, to May 7, 2010, or anytime thereafter. WHEREAS, pursuant to the December 11, 2009 Order After Hearing in this action (D.I. 37), a Further Case Management Conference in this action is scheduled for March 19, 2010, at 10:30 a.m. WHEREAS, Plaintiff served his infringement contentions in this action on January 8, 2010. WHEREAS, the parties disagree regarding the sufficiency of Plaintiff's infringement contentions, and Defendant intends to file a motion to resolve this dispute. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 09-cv-01247 MMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 WHEREAS, the outcome of the parties' dispute regarding infringement contentions will impact the schedule for this case, which is to be discussed at the Further Case Management Conference. WHEREAS, in the interests of efficiency and of avoiding potentially unnecessary expenses, the parties believe that the Further Case Management Conference that is currently scheduled for March 19, 2010, should be rescheduled to May 7, 2010, or anytime thereafter. THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT: The Further Case Management Conference in this action that is currently scheduled for March 19, 2010, at 10:30 a.m. is continued to May 7, 2010, at 10:30 a.m., or anytime thereafter. Dated: March 12, 2010 Respectfully submitted, Jones Day By: /s/ Gregory Lippetz Greg L. Lippetz State Bar No. 154228 JONES DAY Silicon Valley Office 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: 650-739-3939 Facsimile: 650-739-3900 Counsel for Defendant Nokia Inc. In accordance with General Order No. 45, Section X(B), the above signatory attests that 22 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 12, 2010 By: /s/ David Kuhn David N. Kuhn Attorney-at-Law 144 Hagar Avenue Piedmont, California 94611 Telephone: (510) 653-4983 Counsel for Plaintiff Gregory Bender -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 09-cv-01247 MMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: The Case Management Conference is CONTINUED to May 7, 2010. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than April 30, 2010. March 15 DATED: ______________, 2010 By: THE HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Court Judge SVI-78684v1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 09-cv-01247 MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?