Bender v. Nokia Inc.

Filing 61

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The parties' stipulation to continue the case management conference to December 17, 2010 is granted. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 10, 2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2010)

Download PDF
Bender v. Nokia Inc. Doc. 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 David N. Kuhn - State Bar No. 73389 Attorney-at-Law 144 Hagar Avenue Piedmont, CA 94611 Telephone:(510)653-4983 E-mail: dnkuhn@pacbell.net Attorney for plaintiff Gregory Bender UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) Case No. C 09-01247 MMC (MEJ) ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE ) MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE vs. ) ) NOKIA, INC., a Delaware ) corporation, ) Defendant. ) ) GREGORY BENDER, In light of the agreement in principle reached by the 18 parties hereto as to full settlement of the above-captioned case, 19 the parties hereto, through counsel, hereby stipulate that the 20 case management conference currently scheduled for September 17, 21 2010, at 10:30 a.m. may be continued to December 17, 2010, at 22 10:30 a.m. or to such other time as the Court may determine. 23 Dated: September 9, 2010 24 25 26 JONES DAY, Counsel for defendant By_/S/ Gregory L. Lippetz __________ _____________/S/____________________ David N. Kuhn, Counsel for plaintiff Dated: September 9, 2010 Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I, David N. Kuhn, attest that I am the ECF user whose log-in and password are being used to e-file this Stipulation and that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from JONES DAY, counsel for the defendant. Executed on September 9, 2010 PIEDMONT, CALIFORNIA ____________/S/____________ David N. Kuhn PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. September 10, 2010 DATED:________________ ____________________________ Hon. Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?