Wolph et al v. ACER America Corporation

Filing 151

ORDER GRANTING 150 Stipulation Regarding Defendant's Motion to Reconsider Class Certification. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/4/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2012)

Case3:09-cv-01314-JSW Document150 Filed12/30/11 Page1 of 5

5

DANIEL L. WARSHAW (SBN 185365)
([e-mail])
BOBBY POUYA (SBN 245527)
([e-mail])
PEARSON, SIMON, WARSHAW & PENNY, LLP
15165 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 400
Sherman Oaks, California 91403
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class

7

AMIT KURLEKAR (SBN 244230)
([e-mail])
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
580 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

1
2
3
4

8
9
10

15

JAMES J. SCHESKE (admitted pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
DAVID C. LAWRENCE (admitted pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
300 West 6th Street, Suite 2100
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

16

Attorneys for Defendant Acer America Corporation

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
LORA and CLAY WOLPH, on behalf of
Case No. CV 09 1314 JSW
themselves and all others similarly situated,
CLASS ACTION
Plaintiffs,
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
v.
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
RECONSIDER CLASS CERTIFICATION
ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, a
IN LIGHT OF SUPREME COURT’S
California corporation,
DECISION IN WAL-MART V. DUKES

11
12
13
14

18
19
20
21
22
23

25

Complaint Filed: March 25, 2009
Trial Date: None
Hearing: March 30, 2012
Time: 9:00 a.m.

26

Courtroom 11, 19th Floor

Defendant.
24

27
28

1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER CLASS CERTIFICATION
IN LIGHT OF SUPREME COURT’S DECISION IN WAL-MART V. DUKES

CV-09-1314 JSW

Case3:09-cv-01314-JSW Document150 Filed12/30/11 Page2 of 5

1

Plaintiffs LORA AND CLAY WOLPH (“PLAINTIFFS”) and Defendant ACER AMERICA

2

CORPORATION (“Acer America”) hereby enter the following Joint Stipulation and [Proposed]

3

Order Regarding Acer America’s Motion to Reconsider Class Certification in Light of Supreme

4

Court’s Decision in Wal-Mart v. Dukes (“Motion to Reconsider”) (Docket No. 148) in the above-

5

captioned proceeding:

6
7

WHEREAS on November 28, 2011, the Court entered an Order granting Acer America
leave to file its proposed motion to reconsider (Docket No. 147);

8

WHEREAS on December 9, 2011, Acer America filed its Motion to Reconsider;

9

WHEREAS on December 9, 2011, the Court set Acer America’s Motion to Reconsider for

10
11

hearing on March 30, 2012;
WHEREAS on December 23, 2011, Plaintiffs filed their Opposition to Defendant’s Motion

12

to Reconsider Class Certification in Light of Supreme Court’s Decision in Wal-Mart v. Dukes

13

(“Opposition”) (Docket No. 149);

14
15
16
17

WHEREAS the deadline for Acer America to file a Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition is
December 30, 2011;
WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Acer America agree that the deadline for Acer America to file a
Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition should be extended to January 6, 2012;

18

THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

19

1.

20
21

The deadline for Acer America to file a Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition shall be

extended to January 6, 2012.
IT IS SO STIPULATED

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER CLASS CERTIFICATION
IN LIGHT OF SUPREME COURT’S DECISION IN WAL-MART V. DUKES

CV-09-1314 JSW

Case3:09-cv-01314-JSW Document150 Filed12/30/11 Page3 of 5

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

DATED: December 30, 2011

/s/ Daniel L. Warshaw
Daniel L. Warshaw (185365)
[e-mail]
Bobby Pouya (245527)
[e-mail]
Pearson, Simon, Warshaw & Penny, LLP
15165 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 400
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Michael P. Lehmann (77152)
[e-mail]
Hausfeld, LLP
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Richard S. Lewis
[e-mail]
James J. Pizzirusso
[e-mail]
Melinda Coolidge
[e-mail]
Hausfeld, LLP
1700 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Jori Bloom Naegele
[e-mail]
Robert D. Gary
[e-mail]
Gary, Naegele & Theado, LLC
446 Broadway Avenue
Lorain, OH 44052
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class

23
24
25
26
27
28

3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER CLASS CERTIFICATION
IN LIGHT OF SUPREME COURT’S DECISION IN WAL-MART V. DUKES

CV-09-1314 JSW

Case3:09-cv-01314-JSW Document150 Filed12/30/11 Page4 of 5

1

DATED: December 30, 2010

2
3
4

/s/ Amit Kurlekar
Amit Kurlekar (244230)
[e-mail]
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
580 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
James J. Scheske
[e-mail]
David C. Lawrence
[e-mail]
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
300 West 6th Street, Suite 2100
Austin, TX 78701
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Defendant Acer America Corporation

11
12

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14
15

Dated: January 3, 2012
_____________________

__________________________________________
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER CLASS CERTIFICATION
IN LIGHT OF SUPREME COURT’S DECISION IN WAL-MART V. DUKES

CV-09-1314 JSW