Wolph et al v. ACER America Corporation
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/28/2009. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 28, 2009 vs. LORA WOLF, et al.,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C 09-1314 MEJ ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION FORM
ACER AMERICA CORP., Defendant(s). /
Pending before the Court are three pro hac vice applications. Upon review of the record in this action, the Court notes that Plaintiffs have not filed a written consent to Magistrate Judge James' jurisdiction. This civil case was randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge James for all purposes including trial. In accordance with Title 28, U.S.C. § 636(c), the magistrate judges of this district court are designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case, including trial and entry of final judgment, upon the consent of the parties. An appeal from a judgment entered by Magistrate Judge James may be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court. You have the right to have your case assigned to a United States District Judge for trial and disposition. Accordingly, Plaintiffs shall inform the Court whether they consent to Magistrate Judge James' jurisdiction or requests reassignment to a United States District Judge for trial. A copy of both the consent and declination forms may be obtained from the Northern District of California's website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/. From the homepage, click on the "Forms" tab on the left margin, then choose "Civil." The consent/declination form shall be filed by May 14, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED.
MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?