Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB v. Delta Electronics (Thailand) Public Company Limited

Filing 103

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting 65 Motion for Protective Order (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) ) v. ) DELTA ELECTRONICS (THAILAND)) ) PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED, ) ) Defendant(s). ) SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS AB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C09-1326 MMC (BZ) ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER On April 15, 2009, petitioner served "Garnishment Interrogatories" upon third party, Citibank N.A. On May 1, 2009, respondent filed a motion for temporary protective order requesting that "Garnishment Interrogatories" and Memorandum of Garnishee by petitioner be quashed, any third parties be relieved from obligation to answer discovery requests issued thus far by petitioner, and petitioner be restrained from issuing any discovery requests on any third parties other than by Rule 45 subpoena. The motion may be moot. See Opposition Memorandum p.1, ll 5-14. is GRANTED. To the extent it is not, the motion Petitioner has cited no authority in support of serving 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 its "Garnishment Interrogatories" and the Court has found none. Nor has Petitioner cited any authority for serving Federal Rule of Civil interrogatories on a third party. Procedure 33, limits interrogatories to parties. The Court finds no need for a hearing. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's Motion for Temporary Protective Order is GRANTED as to the interrogatories served on Citibank. Dated: June 10, 2009 Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge G:\BZALL\-REFS\SONY V. DELTA ELECTRONICS\ORDER GRANTING TEMP PRO ORDER.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?