Brooks v. Walker

Filing 7

ORDER. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/15/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JERMAINE D. BROOKS, Petitioner, vs. J. WALKER, Warden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 09-1355 CRB (PR) ORDER On July 17, 2009, the court (White, J.) ordered respondent to show cause, within 60 days, as to why a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 should not be granted as to the following four claims ­ (1) the trial court committed Batson error; (2) petitioner's sentence of life without the possibility of parole constitutes cruel and unusual punishment; (3) admission of pre-trial statements of witness Chandler that were described as "credible" and "accurate" violated petitioner's Sixth Amendment rights; and (4) prosecutorial misconduct violated petitioner's rights to due process and a fair trial. On August 7, 2009, the case was reassigned to the undersigned and various deadlines were vacated. In order to expedite this matter, the court orders as follows: 1. Respondent shall file with the court and serve on petitioner, within 30 days of this order, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Respondent shall file with the answer and serve on petitioner a copy of all portions of the state trial record that have been transcribed previously and that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the petition. If petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a traverse with the court and serving it on respondent within 30 days of his receipt of the answer. 2. Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. If respondent files such a motion, petitioner shall file with the court and serve on respondent an opposition or statement of non-opposition within 30 days of receipt of the motion, and respondent shall file with the court and serve on petitioner a reply within 15 days of receipt of any opposition. 3. Petitioner is reminded that all communications with the court must be served on respondent by mailing a true copy of the document to respondent's counsel. Petitioner must also keep the court and all parties informed of any change of address. SO ORDERED. DATED: Oct. 15, 2009 CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Judge G:\PRO-SE\CRB\HC.09\Brooks, J1.or1.wpd 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JERMAINE D. BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. J. WALKER et al, Defendant. / Case Number: CV09-01355 CRB CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on October 15, 2009, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Jermaine D. Brooks V84088 P.O. Box 290066 Represa, CA 95671 Dated: October 15, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Barbara Espinoza, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?