Gee v. Dell'Ara et al
Filing
121
ORDER DISMISSING CASE (30 days conditional dismissal). Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/17/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
No. C 09-01366 CRB
RODNEY GEE,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff,
v.
SUSAN DELL’ARA, individually and in her
official capacity; GREG MUNKS, individually
and in his official capacity; MICHAEL
TOSCANO, individually and in his official
capacity; COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, a public
entity, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, a public entity; MICHAEL
PRICE, individually and in his official capacity,
JAMES A SAUNDERS, individually and in his
official capacity; STEVE SHELDON,
individually and in his official capacity; DAVID
BERTINI, individually and in his official
capacity; JOE SPANHEIMER, individually and
in his official capacity; FERNANDO REALLY
VASQUEZ, individually and in his official
capacity; CITY OF PACIFICA, a public entity;
PACIFICA POLICE DEPARTMENT, a public
entity,
Defendants.
/
25
26
27
28
The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a
settlement of this case,
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed without prejudice; provided,
2
however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within thirty (30) days, with proof of
3
service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has
4
not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be
5
restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
6
7
Dated: January 17, 2012
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?