Gee v. Dell'Ara et al

Filing 121

ORDER DISMISSING CASE (30 days conditional dismissal). Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/17/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 No. C 09-01366 CRB RODNEY GEE, ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff, v. SUSAN DELL’ARA, individually and in her official capacity; GREG MUNKS, individually and in his official capacity; MICHAEL TOSCANO, individually and in his official capacity; COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, a public entity, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, a public entity; MICHAEL PRICE, individually and in his official capacity, JAMES A SAUNDERS, individually and in his official capacity; STEVE SHELDON, individually and in his official capacity; DAVID BERTINI, individually and in his official capacity; JOE SPANHEIMER, individually and in his official capacity; FERNANDO REALLY VASQUEZ, individually and in his official capacity; CITY OF PACIFICA, a public entity; PACIFICA POLICE DEPARTMENT, a public entity, Defendants. / 25 26 27 28 The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this case, 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed without prejudice; provided, 2 however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within thirty (30) days, with proof of 3 service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has 4 not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be 5 restored to the calendar to be set for trial. 6 7 Dated: January 17, 2012 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?