Gee v. Dell'Ara et al

Filing 38

STIPULATION AND ORDER: Case Management Conference reset for 8/3/2009 03:00 PM; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 6/30/2009. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-01366-MHP Document37 Filed07/01/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM E. WEISS (SBN 73108) LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM E. WEISS 130 Sutter Street, Seventh Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 362-6765 Facsimile: (415) 362-2405 Email: weisslaw1@williameweiss.com Attorney for Plaintiff RODNEY GEE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION RODNEY GEE, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN DELL'ARA, individually and in her official capacity; GREG MUNKS, individually and in his official capacity; MICHAEL TOSCANO, individually and in his official capacity; COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, a public entity; COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, a public entity; MICHAEL PRICE, individually and in his official capacity; JAMES A. SAUNDERS, individually and inhis official capacity; STEVE SHELDON, individually and in his official capacity; DAVID BERTINI, individually and in his official capacity; JOE SPANHEIMER, individually and in his official capacity; FERNANDO REALLY VASQUEZ, individually and in his official capacity; CITY OF PACIFICA, a public entity; PACIFICA POLICE DEPARTMENT, a public entity, Defendants. Case No. CV 09-1366 MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Local Rule of Court 16-2(d). 1 Case No. CV 09-1366 MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASEMANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case3:09-cv-01366-MHP Document37 Filed07/01/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 30, 2009 Dated: June 30, 2009 STIPULATION RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among counsel herein that the Case Management Conference in this case may be set for August 3, 2009 at 3:00 p.m. The reason for this stipulation is that plaintiff's counsel is set for jury trial in Garcia v. Pivetti, et al, Superior Court Case No. CU 08 00024 in San Benito County on July 13, 2009, which is the date of the originally set Case Management Conference. The Court is respectfully requested to set the Case Management Conference for the requested date pursuant to Local Rule of Court 16-2(d). This matter was raised at the motion to dismiss hearing on June 22, 2009 and the Court was informed of the schedule problem at that time. The Court suggested the August 3, 2009 date and requested counsel, who were present, to confer and agree on the August date. IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED. Dated: June 30, 2009 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM E. WEISS ____________/s/________________________ WILLIAM E. WEISS Attorney for Plaintiff RODNEY GEE Respectfully submitted, SAN MATEO COUNTY COUNSEL ____________/s/________________________ DAVID A. SILBERMAN Attorney for Defendants SAN MATEO, ET AL. Respectfully submitted, HOWARD ROME MARTIN & RIDLEY LLP ____________/s/________________________ JOSEPH C. HOWRAD, JR. Attorney for Defendants PACIFICA, ET AL. 2 Case No. CV 09-1366 MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASEMANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case3:09-cv-01366-MHP Document37 Filed07/01/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. CV 09-1366 MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASEMANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties, the Case Management Conference in this matter will be rescheduled to August 3, 2009, at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom 15. IT IS SO ORDERED. June 30 Dated: __________, 2009 ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO ari Judge M lyn H. P atel R NIA ____________________________________ DERED O ORJUDGE MARILYN H. PATEL, IT IS S UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?