Minor et al v. FedEx Office & Print Services, Inc. et al

Filing 59

ORDER by MDL Panel Deeming as MOOT the Motion to Transfer Action Under 28 USC Sec. 1407. (rcs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2010)

Download PDF
Aug 26, 2010 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: FEDEX OFFICE AND PRINT SERVICES, INC., CALIFORNIA WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION MDL No. 2192 ORDER DEEMING MOTION MOOT AND VACATING THE SEPTEMBER 30, 2010, HEARING SESSION Before the Panel is a motion by defendants FedEx Office and Print Services, Inc., seeking centralization, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, of the actions on the attached Schedule A in the Central District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. The Panel has now been advised that the one Central District of California action on the attached Schedule A has been dismissed, thus depriving this litigation of its multidistrict character. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 is DEEMED MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Hearing Session Order and the attached Schedule filed on August 12, 2010, are VACATED insofar as they relate to this matter. FOR THE PANEL: Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel IN RE: FEDEX OFFICE AND PRINT SERVICES, INC., CALIFORNIA WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION MDL No. 2192 SCHEDULE A Central District of California Michael Macias v. Fedex Office & Print Services, Inc., C.A. No. 5:10-1165 Northern District of California Gary Minor, et al. v. FedEx Office & Print Services, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:09-1375

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?