Chin v. Honorable Head of Russian Foreign Intelligence (possibly Fradkov) et al

Filing 21

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge James Larson on 9/23/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California LAWRENCE C. CHIN, Plaintiff, v. HONORABLE HEAD OF RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE MIKHAIL FRADKOV, et al., Defendants. ________________________________/ No. C 09-1379 JL 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE On August 20, 2009, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause to Plaintiff why his case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff previously consented to this Court's jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(c). The last day to serve any defendant was July 27, 2009, as required by Rule 4(m), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Plaintiff has not served any defendant. In addition, Plaintiff failed to appear for the Initial Case Management Conference on August 19. In the Order to Show Cause, the Court warned Plaintiff that if he failed to appear on September 23, his case would be dismissed with prejudice. The Court also emailed Plaintiff and attempted to reach him by telephone, but his phone number was no longer a working number. The case was called and Plaintiff again failed to appear. C-09-1379 DISMISSAL Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Accordingly, his case is dismissed with prejudice. The clerk shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 23, 2009 __________________________________ James Larson U.S. Magistrate Judge G:\JLALL\CHAMBERS\CASES\CIVIL\09-1379\DISMISSAL.wpd United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C-09-1379 DISMISSAL Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?