Jet Works Air Center Management, L.L.C. v. Jetworks International, Inc

Filing 16

ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued to October 16, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 2, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STEVEN H. FRANKEL (SBN 171919) SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP 525 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 882-5000 Facsimile: (415) 882-0300 Email: sfrankel@sonnenschein.com Attorneys for Plaintiff JET WORKS AIR CENTER MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JET WORKS AIR CENTER MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., a Texas Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, vs. JETWORKS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Florida Corporation, Defendant. Plaintiff Jet Works Air Center Management, L.L.C.'s Motion for Administrative Relief Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 came before the Court, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that in light of the Clerk's entry of default against defendant Jetworks International, Inc. on June 9, 2009, the filing of a Joint Case Management Conference Statement by July 10, 2009 is not required, and the Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for July 17, 2009 at 10:30 a.m. is vacated. continued to October 16, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. July 2, 2009 Dated: _________________ Case No. 09-1395 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF JET WORKS AIR CENTER MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 7-11 ; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE __________________________ Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADMIN. RELIEF CASE NO. 09-1395 MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?