Kroll v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan

Filing 74

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY re #72 Stipulation filed by Cinda Kroll, #71 Stipulation filed by Cinda Kroll. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/25/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2010)

Download PDF
Kroll v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan Doc. 74 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY LAURENCE F. PADWAY Bar. No. 89314 lp@padway.com 1516 Oak Street, Suite 109 Alameda, California 94501 Telephone: (510) 814-0680 Facsimile: (510) 814-0650 Attorneys for Plaintiff Cinda Kroll SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP REBECCA A. HULL Bar No. 99802 rebecca.hull@sdma.com One Market Plaza Steuart Tower, 8th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 781-7900 Facsimile: (415) 781-2635 Attorneys for Defendant Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan and Real Party in Interest Metropolitan Life Insurance Company UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Cinda Kroll, Plaintiff, v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan, Defendant. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Real Party in Interest. CASE NO. C09-cv-01404 JSW (EMC) AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S RELY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTEMPT Hon. Edward M. Chen Plaintiff Cinda Kroll, defendant Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan, and real party in interest Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (the latter two parties collectively referred to as "defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby agree and stipulate that the time for filing plaintiff's reply brief to defendants' opposition -1CASE NO. C09-cv-01404 JSW (EMC) AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIM E FOR PLAINTIFF'S REPLY Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 to plaintiff's motion for contempt (Doc. Nos. 69) shall be extended one day, so that plaintiff's reply shall be due tomorrow, August 26, 2010. Good cause exists for the one-day extension because of the sudden illness of plaintiff's counsel. WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court consent to order an extension to August 26, 2010, for filing plaintiff's reply. DATED: August 25, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY By:/s/ Laurence F. Padway Laurence F. Padway Attorneys for Plaintiff Cinda Kroll DATED: August 25, 2010 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP By:/s/ Rebecca A. Hull Rebecca A. Hull Attorneys for Defendant Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan and Real Party in Interest Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ORDER Upon stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. 8/25/10 Dated: ______________________ UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA __________________________ ER N F D IS T IC T O R -2CASE NO. C09-cv-01404 JSW (EMC) AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIM E FOR PLAINTIFF'S REPLY A C LI FO dwar Judge E d M. Ch en R NIA D EDWARD M. CHEN RDERE IS SO O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IT RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?