Fahy v. Tarbox et al
ORDER re 115 MOTION to Compel filed by Frank Fahy. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 7/8/10. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2010)
Fahy v. Tarbox et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is Plaintiff Frank Fahy's Motion "for an Order to Compell [sic] Responses to Interrogatories and to Provide Initial Disclosure Discovery from Defendant Alec Steiner," (Docket No. 115), currently set for hearing on August 26, 2010. Upon review of the record, it appears that plaintiff has not met and conferred with defendant in person or by telephone regarding the discovery dispute prior to filing the instant motion. Pursuant to L.R. 37-1(a) and Judge Ryu's Order Re Discovery Procedures (Docket No. 120), it is therefore ordered that plaintiff shall by July 22, 2010: (1) meet and confer with defense counsel for Mr. Steiner in person or by telephone; and (2) file a supplemental declaration setting forth plaintiff's meet and confer efforts and the final positions of each party. The briefing schedule shall be amended as follows: Defendant shall be permitted until July 29, 2010 to file his opposition to plaintiff's motion to compel. v. ORPHEOS TARBOX, Defendant. / FRANK FAHY, Plaintiff, No. C-09-01420-MMC (DMR) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF FRANK FAHY'S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES AND TO PROVIDE INITIAL DISCLOSURES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Plaintiff shall be permitted until August 5, 2010 to file a reply brief in support of his motion.
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T
RT U O
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 8, 2010
C RN F _______________________________ D IS T IC T O R DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge
o Judge D
Ryu nna M.
O IT IS S
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?