Mohsen v. Moss et al

Filing 54

ORDER Denying as Moot 37 MOTION to Quash filed by United States Patent and Trademark Office. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 01/03/2013. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
AMR MOHSEN,

No. C 09-01426 CRB (DMR)

9
Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION
TO QUASH SUBPOENA ON US
PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

11
JOEL MOSS, et al.,
12
13

Defendants.
___________________________________/

14
Before the court is the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (“PTO”) motion to
15
quash a subpoena served on it by pro se Plaintiff Amr Mohsen. [Docket No. 37.] On December 7,
16
2012, the court issued an order on the motion to quash in which the court construed Plaintiff’s
17
position in opposition to the motion to quash as a withdrawal with prejudice of the subpoena at
18
issue. [Docket No. 50 (Order on Motion to Quash).] The court gave Plaintiff until December 21,
19
2012 to object to the court’s construing his position this way. (Order on Motion to Quash 3.)
20
Having received no objection from Plaintiff to the December 7, 2012 order, the court hereby deems
21
Plaintiff’s subpoena to the PTO withdrawn with prejudice. Accordingly, the PTO’s motion to quash
22
the subpoena is DENIED as moot.
23

S
H

ER

R NIA
FO

RT

28

DONNA M. RYU na M. Ryu
United States e Don
Judg Magistrate Judge

NO

27

LI

Dated: January 3, 2013
26

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

A

25

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

IT IS SO ORDERED.
24

UNIT
ED

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C