Mohsen v. Moss et al
ORDER Denying as Moot 37 MOTION to Quash filed by United States Patent and Trademark Office. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 01/03/2013. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. C 09-01426 CRB (DMR)
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION
TO QUASH SUBPOENA ON US
PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
JOEL MOSS, et al.,
Before the court is the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (“PTO”) motion to
quash a subpoena served on it by pro se Plaintiff Amr Mohsen. [Docket No. 37.] On December 7,
2012, the court issued an order on the motion to quash in which the court construed Plaintiff’s
position in opposition to the motion to quash as a withdrawal with prejudice of the subpoena at
issue. [Docket No. 50 (Order on Motion to Quash).] The court gave Plaintiff until December 21,
2012 to object to the court’s construing his position this way. (Order on Motion to Quash 3.)
Having received no objection from Plaintiff to the December 7, 2012 order, the court hereby deems
Plaintiff’s subpoena to the PTO withdrawn with prejudice. Accordingly, the PTO’s motion to quash
the subpoena is DENIED as moot.
DONNA M. RYU na M. Ryu
United States e Don
Judg Magistrate Judge
Dated: January 3, 2013
IT IS S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
D IS T IC T
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?