Tonsing v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 48

STIPULATION AND ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7-3(d) RE FILING SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/10/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2011)

*E-Filed 6/10/11*
1
2
3
4
5
6

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
ELIZABETH SALVESON, State Bar #83788
Chief Labor Attorney
LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH, State Bar #129688
Deputy City Attorney
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Fifth Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE COMMISSION, and
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
DANIEL M. CRAWFORD
354 Pine Street, Third Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff / Petitioner
MATTHEW P. TONSING

16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19
20
21

MATTHEW P. TONSING,
Petitioner and Plaintiff,
vs.

23

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE
COMMISSION, and SAN FRANCISCO
POLICE DEPARTMENT,

24

Respondents and Defendants.

22

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL PER LR 7-3(d)

Case No. C 09-01446 RS

Case No. C09-1446 CW
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7-3(d)
RE FILING SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

1
2
3

WHEREAS, defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(c) was argued before
and taken under the Court on June 2, 2011 and;
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2011 the California Court of Appeal filed a decision entitled Joy Hall-

4

Villareal v. City of Fresno et. al., a copy of which is attached hereto, that is relevant to the matter

5

under submission;

6

THEREFORE the parties stipulate that the Joy Hall-Villareal v. City of Fresno et. al. be filed

7

with the court for its consideration.

8

IT IS SO STIPULATED

9
10

Dated: June 3, 2011

Respectfully submitted,
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
ELIZABETH S. SALVESON
Chief Labor Attorney
LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH
Deputy City Attorney

11
12
13
14
15

By: /s/Lawrence Hecimovich
LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH
Attorneys for Defendants

16
17
18
19

Dated: June 3, 2011

By: /s/Daniel M. Crawford
Attorneys for Plaintiff / Petitioner

20
21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED

6/10/11

24

_________________________
Honorable Richard Seeborg
Judge of the District Court

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL PER LR 7-3(d)

Case No. C 09-01446 RS

1