Jankey et al v. Tufu Village et al

Filing 12

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 18, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 18, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LES JANKEY, et al. Plaintiffs, v. TOFU VILLAGE, et al., Defendants. /

No. C-09-1449 MMC ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

By order filed April 2, 2009, the parties and counsel were ordered to hold a joint inspection of the premises at issue herein no later than July 13, 2009. (See Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial Of Right of Access Under ADA.) Further, plaintiffs were ordered to file a Notice of Need for Mediation no later than 45 days after the joint site inspection. (See id.) To date, plaintiffs have not filed a Notice of Need for Mediation. Accordingly, plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and no later than October 2, 2009, why the above-titled action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. In the event plaintiffs file a Notice of Need for Mediation by October 2, 2009, this order will be discharged. IT IS SO ORDERED.