Perdana Capital (Labuan) Inc. v. Chowdry et al

Filing 162

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 161 FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Motion Hearing set for 2/9/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/28/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 12/28/11* 1 2 3 4 Michael Q. Eagan (CA #63479) Thomas H. Manulkin (CA #229630) LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL Q. EAGAN Three Embarcadero Center Eighth Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 765-4600 Fax: (415) 765-4659 5 Attorneys for Defendants 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 PERDANA CAPITAL (LABUAN) INC., a Malaysian Corporation, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MOHAMMAD AKRAM CHOWDRY, an ) Individual; HI-TECH VENTURE PARTNERS, ) LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; ) HI-TECH ASSOCIATES, LLC, a California ) Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1-50, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ ) CASE NO. CV 09-01479 RS Assigned to Hon. Richard Seeborg STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF PERDANA CAPITAL (LABAUN), INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1CASE NO. CV 09-01479 RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF PERDANA CAPITAL (LABAU N), INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMM ARY JUDGMENT 1 WHEREAS, the Case Management Scheduling Order in this case, dated March 7, 2012, 2 (Docket No. 134) (“Scheduling Order”) ordered that “[a]ll pretrial motions must be filed and 3 served pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7 [and] ... shall be heard no later than January 26, 2012"; 4 WHEREAS, on December 21, 2011, defendants Mohammad Akram Chowdry, Hi-Tech 5 Venture Partners, LLC and Hi-Tech Associates, LLC (collectively “defendants”) filed Motions 6 for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 146-155) (“Motions for Summary Judgment”) with a 7 hearing date of January 26, 2012; 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 WHEREAS, on December 23, 2011, plaintiff Perdana Capital (Labaun), Inc. (“plaintiff”) filed an Ex Parte Application for an Order Continuing Hearing on Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 156) (“Application”); WHEREAS, on December 26, 2011, defendants filed a Notice of Intent to File a Response to the Application (Docket No. 157); WHEREAS, on December 27, 2011, defendants filed a Response to the Application (Docket No. 158); WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred with respect to the issues raised in the Application;. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, AGREED AND RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED by the undersigned parties, as follows: 20 That the hearing on defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment be continued 9, from January 26, 2012 to Thursday, February 2, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3 on the 17th 21 Floor of the United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco; 22 23 24 25 1. 2. That plaintiff’s oppositions to defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment shall be filed and served no later than January 11, 2012; 3. That defendants’ replies to plaintiff’s oppositions to defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment shall be filed and served no later than January 19, 2012; 26 27 28 -2CASE NO. CV 09-01479 RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF PERDANA CAPITAL (LABAU N), INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMM ARY JUDGMENT 1 4. That this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order shall have no effect on any deadlines 2 with respect to any other pretrial motion, and, in particular, that the deadlines and requirements 3 with respect to pretrial motions established by the Scheduling Order shall otherwise remain in 4 full force and effect. 5 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 7 DATED: December 28, 2011 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL Q. EAGAN 8 By: ____________/s_____________ Thomas H. Manulkin Attorneys for Defendants Mohammad Akram Chowdry, Hi-Tech Venture Partners, LLC and Hi-Tech Associates, LLC 9 10 11 12 DATED: December 28, 2011 13 KAUFMAN DOLOWICH VOLUCK & GONZO LLP By: ____________/s____________ Joseph Kouri Attorneys for Plaintiff Perdana Capital (Labuan), Inc. 14 15 16 I, Thomas H. Manulkin, of the Law Offices of Michael Q. Eagan, whose ID and 17 password are being used to file this Stipulation, hereby attest, in accordance with General Order 18 45, X(B), that Joseph Kouri of Kaufman Dolowich Voluck & Gonzo, LLP, has concurred in this 19 filing. 20 21 22 DATED: December 28, 2011 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL Q. EAGAN By: ____________/s______________ Thomas H. Manulkin, Esq. 23 24 Attorneys for Defendants Mohammad Akram Chowdry, Hi-Tech Venture Partners, LLC and Hi-Tech Associates, LLC 25 26 27 28 -3CASE NO. CV 09-01479 RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF PERDANA CAPITAL (LABAU N), INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMM ARY JUDGMENT 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 2 12/28/11 DATED: __________________________ 3 __________________________________ Hon. Richard Seeborg United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4CASE NO. CV 09-01479 RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF PERDANA CAPITAL (LABAU N), INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMM ARY JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?