Proudfoot et al v. City Of Oakland et al

Filing 19

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 3, 2009. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 EDWARD J. PROUDFOOT and MICHELLE MILLIORN, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants. / No. C 09-01492 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss this action, and the motion is currently scheduled to be heard August 20, 2009. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, any brief in opposition to the motion was due July 30, 2009, but no such opposition was received. Plaintiffs' counsel had previously indicated that, due to the death of plaintiff Edward J. Proudfoot, an amended complaint will be necessary. The motion, however, has not been withdrawn and remains on the calendar. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to respond by AUGUST 5, 2009, AT NOON, and show cause for the failure to respond. If plaintiffs fail to respond, the motion may be granted as unopposed. Alternately, if plaintiffs do not oppose the motion they must file a statement of non-opposition in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(b). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 3, 2009.

WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE