Proudfoot et al v. City Of Oakland et al
Filing
31
ORDER REGARDING NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 23, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2010)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 EDWARD J. PROUDFOOT and MICHELLE MILLIORN, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants. / No. C 09-01492 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER REGARDING NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION
In this action under 42 U.S.C. 1983, defendants answered the amended complaint in September 2009. On March 16, 2010, plaintiff filed a notice to dismiss this action in its entirety against all defendants. Subject to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order after the opposing parties serve an answer only if a stipulation of dismissal is signed by all parties who have appeared. By NOON ON FRIDAY, MARCH 26, 2010, the parties shall please file a stipulation of dismissal or defendants shall file a written statement explaining the reasons why they oppose dismissal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 23, 2010.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
