Nwabueze v. AT&T Inc. et al

Filing 82

ORDER reactivating motion as pending (Doc. #44, defts. motion to dismiss) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2010)

Nwabueze v. AT&T Inc. et al

Doc. 82

1 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP ROXANE A. POLIDORA #135972 2 [e-mail] 50 Fremont Street, Fifth Floor 3 Post Office Box 7880 San Francisco, CA 94120-7880 4 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 5 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 6 DOUGLAS R. TRIBBLE #116868 CONNIE J. WOLFE #207661 7 [e-mail] [e-mail] 8 501 West Broadway, Suite 1100 San Diego, CA 92126-3575 9 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 10 Attorneys for Defendants 11 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT&T SERVICES, INC., and 12 AT&T OPERATIONS, INC. 13 14 15 16 ) 17 JOY NWABUEZE, individually and on behalf ) Case No. CV 09-01529 SI of a class of similarly situated individuals, ) 18 ) STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR Plaintiff, ) ORDER REGARDING THE RE-FILING 19 ) OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO vs. ) DISMISS 20 ) AT&T INC., a Delaware corporation; ) Courtroom: 10 21 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY ) Judge: Hon. Susan Illston d/b/a AT&T CALIFORNIA, a California ) 22 corporation; AT&T SERVICES, INC., a ) First Amended Class Action Complaint Delaware corporation; AT&T OPERATIONS, ) Filed: August 13, 2009 23 INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 ) through 21, ) Defendants. 24 25 WHEREAS, the parties previously filed a stipulation and proposed order on September 7, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

26 2010 (Document No. 76) to withdraw the motion to dismiss the action pursuant to Federal Rules 27 of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6) of Defendants Pacific Bell Telephone Company, AT&T 28 Services, Inc. and AT&T Operations ("Defendants"); -1STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: THE RE-FILING OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

Case No. CV 09-01529 SI

Dockets.Justia.com

1

WHEREAS, on September 8, 2010, the Court entered the Order withdrawing the motion

2 to dismiss without prejudice to re-file said motion at a later date, without further briefing or oral 3 argument (Document No. 77); 4 WHEREAS, Defendants now seek to re-file the motion to dismiss and all supporting

5 documentation; 6 WHEREAS, Plaintiff in response seeks to re-file her opposition and all supporting

7 documentation; 8 WHEREAS the documents associated with Defendant's motion to dismiss and Plaintiff's

9 opposition are as follows in the Court's docket: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 · · · · · · MOTION OF DEFENDANTS PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT&T SERVICES, INC., AND AT&T OPERATIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [F.R.C.P. 12(B)(6)]; SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM (Document No. 44); REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF DEFENDANT PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT&T SERVICES, INC., AND AT&T OPERATIONS, INC. TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT [F.R.C.P. 12(B)(6)]; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF (Document No. 45); EXHIBITS RE [45] REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE (Document No. 46); [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF DEFENDANTS PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT&T SERVICES, INC., AND AT&T OPERATIONS, INC. TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT [F.R.C.P. 12(B)(6)] (Document No. 47); PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Document No. 57); REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF DEFENDANTS PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT&T SERVICES, INC., AND AT&T OPERATIONS, INC. TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT -2STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: THE RE-FILING OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

Case No. CV 09-01529 SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 · · · ·

[F.R.C.P. 12(B)(6)] (Document No. 58); LETTER FROM JOHN G. JACOBS LETTER TO COURT (Document No. 65); PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Document No. 66); DEFENDANTS' OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [F.R.C.P. 12(B)(6)] (Document No. 67); and Hearing Transcript of November 20, 2009 re: motion to dismiss (Document No. 61).

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by and between the parties, through their

12 respective counsel, that the parties request an order from the Court deeming that Defendants' 13 Motion to Dismiss and all supporting and opposing documents (as listed above) to be re-filed as 14 of the date of the Court's Order. 15 Dated: October 14, 2010. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: October 14, 2010. 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3By /s/ John G. Jacobs John G. Jacobs Attorneys for Plaintiff JOY NWABUEZE KELLER GROVER, LLP JEFFREY F. KELLER JACOBS KOLTON, CHTD. JOHN G. JACOBS BRYAN G. KOLTON DAVID SCHACHMAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. DAVID SCHACHMAN By /s/ Roxane A. Polidora Roxane A. Polidora Attorneys for Defendants PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT&T SERVICES, INC., and AT&T OPERATIONS, INC. PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP ROXANE A. POLIDORA DOUGLAS R. TRIBBLE CONNIE J. WOLFE

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: THE RE-FILING OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

Case No. CV 09-01529 SI

1 2 3

ATTESTATION OF SIGNATURE (N.D. Cal. General Order 45) I, Roxane A. Polidora, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the following

4 document: STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER REGARDING THE RE5 FILING OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS has been obtained from all of the sig6 natories. 7 Dated: October 14, 2010 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: THE RE-FILING OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

/s/ Roxane A. Polidora

Case No. CV 09-01529 SI

1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 The motion of Defendants Pacific Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Services, Inc.

3 and AT&T Operations to dismiss this action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 4 Rule 12(b)(6), originally filed on September 18, 2009 and heard on November 20, 2009, is 5 hereby deemed re-filed, along with all supporting and opposing documents as listed below: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: THE RE-FILING OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

·

MOTION OF DEFENDANTS PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT&T SERVICES, INC., AND AT&T OPERATIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [F.R.C.P. 12(B)(6)]; SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM (Document No. 44);

·

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF DEFENDANT PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT&T SERVICES, INC., AND AT&T OPERATIONS, INC. TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT [F.R.C.P. 12(B)(6)]; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF (Document No. 45);

· ·

EXHIBITS RE [45] REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE (Document No. 46); [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF DEFENDANTS PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT&T SERVICES, INC., AND AT&T OPERATIONS, INC. TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT [F.R.C.P. 12(B)(6)] (Document No. 47);

·

PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Document No. 57);

·

REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF DEFENDANTS PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT&T SERVICES, INC., AND AT&T OPERATIONS, INC. TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [F.R.C.P. 12(B)(6)] (Document No. 58);

·

LETTER FROM JOHN G. JACOBS LETTER TO COURT (Document No. 65);

Case No. CV 09-01529 SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Date: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

·

PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Document No. 66); and

·

DEFENDANTS' OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [F.R.C.P. 12(B)(6)] (Document No. 67); and

·

Hearing Transcript of November 20, 2009 re: motion to dismiss (Document No. 61).

The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge

-6-

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: THE RE-FILING OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

Case No. CV 09-01529 SI

1 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 14, 2010, a true and correct copy of STIPULATION

3 AND REQUEST FOR ORDER REGARDING THE RE-FILING OF DEFENDANTS' 4 MOTION TO DISMISS was electronically transmitted to the Clerk of the Court using the 5 ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to all ECF registrants 6 in this case. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -7STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: THE RE-FILING OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

/s/Kathy Stout

Kathy Stout

Case No. CV 09-01529 SI