Nwabueze v. AT&T Inc. et al

Filing 94

ORDER EXTENDING AT&T, INC.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by AT&T Inc., AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2011)

Download PDF
Nwabueze v. AT&T Inc. et al Doc. 94 1 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 2 ROXANE A. POLIDORA #135972 roxane.polidora@pillsburylaw.com 3 50 Fremont Street, Fifth Floor Post Office Box 7880 4 San Francisco, CA 94120-7880 Telephone: (415) 983-1000 5 Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 6 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 7 DOUGLAS R. TRIBBLE #116868 CONNIE J. WOLFE #207661 8 douglas.tribble@pillsburylaw.com connie.wolfe@pillsburylaw.com 9 501 West Broadway, Suite 1100 San Diego, CA 92126-3575 10 Telephone: (619) 234-5000 Facsimile: (619) 236-1995 11 Attorneys for Defendants 12 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T INC. and 13 AT&T OPERATIONS, INC. 14 15 16 17 18 19 ) 20 JOY NWABUEZE, individually and on behalf ) of a class of similarly situated individuals, ) 21 ) Plaintiff, ) 22 ) vs. ) 23 ) AT&T INC., a Delaware corporation; ) 24 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY ) d/b/a AT&T CALIFORNIA, a California ) 25 corporation; AT&T SERVICES, INC., a ) Delaware corporation; AT&T OPERATIONS, ) 26 INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 ) through 21, ) 27 ) Defendants. ) 28 ) 601401315v1 KELLER GROVER, LLP JEFFREY F. KELLER #148005 jfkeller@kellergrover.com 1965 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94103 Telephone: (415) 543-1305 Facsimile: (415) 543-7861 JACOBS KOLTON, CHTD. JOHN G. JACOBS (Pro Hac Vice) BRYAN G. KOLTON (Pro Hac Vice) jgjacobs@jacobskolton.com bgkolton@jacobskolton.com 122 South Michigan Avenue, Suite 1850 Chicago, IL 60603 Telephone: (312) 427-4000 Facsimile: (312) 427-1850 DAVID SCHACHMAN & ASSOC., PC DAVID SCHACHMAN (Pro Hac Vice) ds@schachmanlaw.com 122 South Michigan Avenue, Suite 1850 Chicago, IL 60603 Telephone: (312) 427-9500 Facsimile: (312) 427-1850 Attorneys for Plaintiff JOY NWABUEZE and the Putative Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case No. CV 09-01529 SI STIPULATED REQUEST AND [Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT AT&T, INC.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [Local Rule 6-2] Judge: Hon. Susan Illston First Amended Class Action Complaint Filed: August 13, 2009 STIPULATED REQUEST AND [Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING AT&T, INC.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. CV Dockets.Justia.com 09-01529 SI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Joy Nwabueze ("Plaintiff") caused the Summons and Complaint in this action to be served on Defendant AT&T Inc. on April 30, 2009; WHEREAS, Plaintiff subsequently filed a First Amended Complaint for Damages, Declaratory and Injunctive Relief on August 13, 2009; WHEREAS, Defendant AT&T, Inc. filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on September 18, 2009, and that motion was taken off calendar pending the resolution of the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by the other Defendants and joined by AT&T Inc. in the alternative; WHEREAS, in a Minute Order dated February 4, 2011, the Court terminated all prior motions to dismiss and set March 18, 2011 as the date by which any such motions to dismiss must be refiled, if necessary; WHEREAS, parties have been engaged in discussions regarding the possible dismissal without prejudice of Defendant AT&T, Inc., and require additional time to complete such discussions; WHEREAS, Defendant AT&T, Inc. requested, and Plaintiff agreed, to stipulate to a thirty-day extension of the time, until April 18, 2011, within which Defendant AT&T, Inc. must respond to the First Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, the parties believe that deferring the issue of personal jurisdiction over Defendant AT&T, Inc. at this time will not delay the litigation and may instead realize efficiencies and judicial economy; WHEREAS, the extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order other than Defendant AT&T, Inc.'s response date; /// /// /// 601401315v1 -2- STIPULATED REQUEST AND [Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING AT&T, INC.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. CV 09-01529 SI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that Defendant AT&T Inc. shall have until April 18, 2011, within which to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Dated: March 14, 2011. PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP ROXANE A. POLIDORA CONNIE J. WOLFE By /s/ Roxane A. Polidora Roxane A. Polidora Attorneys for Defendant AT&T INC. Dated: March 14, 2011 KELLER GROVER, LLP JEFFREY F. KELLER JACOBS KOLTON, CHTD. JOHN G. JACOBS BRYAN G. KOLTON DAVID SCHACHMAN & ASSOC., PC DAVID SCHACHMAN By /s/ John G. Jacobs John G. Jacobs Attorneys for Plaintiff JOY NWABUEZE and the Putative Class ATTESTATION OF SIGNATURE (N.D. Cal. General Order 45) I, Roxane A. Polidora, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the following document: STIPULATED REQUEST AND [Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT AT&T, INC.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [Local Rule 6-2] has been obtained from all of the signatories. Dated: March 14, 2011 /// /// /// /s/ Roxane A. Polidora 601401315v1 -3- STIPULATED REQUEST AND [Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT AT&T, INC. TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. CV 09-01529 SI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 601401315v1 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The deadline for Defendant AT&T Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint shall be and is hereby extended to April 17, 2011. Date: 3/14/11 The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge -4- STIPULATED REQUEST AND [Proposed] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT AT&T, INC. TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. CV 09-01529 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?