May v. UnumProvident Corporation et al

Filing 64

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/7/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2011)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

Sean S. May, M.D.,

6
7
8

Plaintiff,

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND
PRETRIAL MATTERS

v.
UnumProvident Corporation, et al.,

9

Defendant.

10

/

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

No. CV09-01537 JSW

12
Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case
13
Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further
14
ORDERED that:
15
A.

DATES

16
Jury Trial Date: 7/30/2012, at 8:00 a.m.,
17
Pretrial Conference: Monday, 7/9/2012, at 2:00 p.m.
18
Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 5/18/2012, 9:00 a.m.
19
Last Day for Expert Discovery/Disclosure: 4/17/2012
20
Close of Non-expert Discovery: 6/18/2012
21
Further Case Management Conference: 3/9/2012, 1:30 p.m.
22
Joint Supplemental Case Management Statement due: 3/2/2012
23
B.

DISCOVERY

24
The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to
25
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses
26
pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of
27
non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all
28
supplementation has been completed.

1

C.

2

By agreement of the parties, this matter is referred to private ADR, to be conducted by

3

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

September 6, 2011. The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is resolved.

4

D.

PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER

5

No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its

6

own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b)

7

without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline

8

contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties

9

may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the
date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule

12

that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are

13

specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain

14

leave of Court.

15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16
Dated: June 7, 2011
17

JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2