Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Teleconference Systems, LLC et al

Filing 237

ORDER GRANTING (236 in 3:09-cv-01550-JSW)and (88 in 3:10-cv-05740-JSW) Stipulation to Extend Claim Construction Deadlines. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 3/18/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2011)

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Teleconference Systems, LLC et al

Doc. 237

1

2
3 4 5
6

ANTHONY G. SIMON, Mo. Bar No. 38745 (pro hac vice) TIMOTHY E. GROCHOCINSKl, Mo. Bar No. 59607 (pro hac vice) The Simon Law Firm, P.C. 800 Market St., Suite 1700 St. Louis, MO 63101 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: (314-241-2029 [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC and MARGALLA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant, Case No. C 09-01550 JSW JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE

7
8

9
10
11

12

13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

v.
TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC and MARGALLA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendants, CounterclaimPlaintiffs and Third Party Plaintiff, v. PROCTOR & GAMBLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al. Third Party Defendants.

22
23 24 25 26 27 28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED[ ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES

WHEREFORE Defendant Teleconference Systems, LLC and Counterclaim-Defendant Margalla Communications, Inc. file this Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time to extend claim construction deadlines and in support thereof states as follows: WHEREFORE, on August 9, 2010, the Court issued an Order adopting the schedule for Patent Local Rules disclosures and claim construction briefing outlined by the parties in their

CASE NO. C 09·01550 JSW

Dockets.Justia.com

1

Joint Case Management Statements in the California Actions [Doc. 201]. WHEREFORE, on December 22,2010, Judge Jeffrey S. White issued an Order granting an extension of the claim construction deadlines [Doc. 228]. WHEREFORE Defendant and Counterclaim Defendant's counsel requests the

2
3

4
5
6

aforementioned extensions due to being out of the office on family vacations. WHEREFORE the Defendant and Counterclaim Defendant requests and Plaintiff and Third Party Defendants have consented to a one week extension of the following deadlines as outlined in the chart below:

7
8 9

10 11 12
13

~I;~
March 18,2011 March 25, 2011

March 25, 2011 Construction Statement and Prehearing Statement pursuant to Pat. Exchange of expert reports on Claim Construction

April 1, 2011

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

March 25, 2011

April I, 2011

WHEREFORE the requested extension does not affect any other deadlines scheduled in this matter. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES that, subject to the Court's approval, the claim construction deadlines be extended as outlined in the chart be extended as requested. Dated: March 18, 2011

22
23 24 25

THE SIMON LAW FIRM, P.C.
By: /s/ Timothy E. Grochocinski Timothy E. Grochocinski [e-mail]

Dated:

March 18,2011

WElL, GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP
By: /s/ Andrew Perito Andrew Perito [e-mail]
CASE NO. C 09·01550 JSW

26
27

28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED) ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES

2

1

2
Dated: 3
4

March 18,2011

DUANE MORRIS, LLP
By: /s/ Stephen H. Sutro Stephen H. Sutro [e-mail]

5
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
6 I, Timothy E. Grochocinski, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been

7
8
obtained from the other signatory. In compliance with General Order 45, paragraph X.B., I

9
10
11 12 13

hereby attest that Andrew Perito and Stephen H. Sutro have concurred in this filing. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. March 18, 2011. By: /s/ Timothy E. Grochocinski Timothy E. Grochocinski Executed on

14
15 16
17

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing was served on all parties of record via the Court's CMlECF system on March 18,2011. /s/ Timothy E. Grochocinski Timothy E. Grochocinski

18
19

20 21

22
23 24 25

26
27 28
CASE NO. C 09·01 sso JSW JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED[ ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES

3

1

2
3
4
5 CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case No. C 09-01550 JSW

Plaintiff and Counterc1aimDefendant, v.

[PROPOSED] ORDER
HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE

6

7
8

TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC and MARGALLA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendants, Counterc1aimPlaintiffs and Third Party Plaintiff,

9
10 11 12

v.
PROCTOR & GAMBLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al. Third Party Defendants.

13
14 15

16
17 18 19 20 21

Pursuant to the foregoing Joint Stipulation and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED that the one week extension of the claim construction deadlines as outlined below are GRANTED.

22
23 24 25

Parties' regarding the terms to be construed by the Court Filing ofJoint ,",UUUi Construction Statement and Prehearing Statement pursuant Pat. L.R. 4-3 Exchange of expert reports on Claim Construction

March 25, 2011

April 1, 2011

25,2011

April 1, 2011

26
27
28

March 18, _ Dated: _ _ _ _2011
Jeffrey S. White U.S. District Judge
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED[ ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES

CASE NO. C 09-01550 JSW