Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Teleconference Systems, LLC et al

Filing 237

ORDER GRANTING (236 in 3:09-cv-01550-JSW)and (88 in 3:10-cv-05740-JSW) Stipulation to Extend Claim Construction Deadlines. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 3/18/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2011)

Download PDF
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Teleconference Systems, LLC et al Doc. 237 1 2 3 4 5 6 ANTHONY G. SIMON, Mo. Bar No. 38745 (pro hac vice) TIMOTHY E. GROCHOCINSKl, Mo. Bar No. 59607 (pro hac vice) The Simon Law Firm, P.C. 800 Market St., Suite 1700 St. Louis, MO 63101 Telephone: (314) 241-2929 Facsimile: (314-241-2029 asimon@simonlawpc.com teg@simonlawpc.com Attorneys for Defendants TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC and MARGALLA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant, Case No. C 09-01550 JSW JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 v. TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC and MARGALLA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendants, CounterclaimPlaintiffs and Third Party Plaintiff, v. PROCTOR & GAMBLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al. Third Party Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED[ ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES WHEREFORE Defendant Teleconference Systems, LLC and Counterclaim-Defendant Margalla Communications, Inc. file this Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time to extend claim construction deadlines and in support thereof states as follows: WHEREFORE, on August 9, 2010, the Court issued an Order adopting the schedule for Patent Local Rules disclosures and claim construction briefing outlined by the parties in their CASE NO. C 0901550 JSW Dockets.Justia.com 1 Joint Case Management Statements in the California Actions [Doc. 201]. WHEREFORE, on December 22,2010, Judge Jeffrey S. White issued an Order granting an extension of the claim construction deadlines [Doc. 228]. WHEREFORE Defendant and Counterclaim Defendant's counsel requests the 2 3 4 5 6 aforementioned extensions due to being out of the office on family vacations. WHEREFORE the Defendant and Counterclaim Defendant requests and Plaintiff and Third Party Defendants have consented to a one week extension of the following deadlines as outlined in the chart below: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ~I;~ March 18,2011 March 25, 2011 March 25, 2011 Construction Statement and Prehearing Statement pursuant to Pat. Exchange of expert reports on Claim Construction April 1, 2011 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 March 25, 2011 April I, 2011 WHEREFORE the requested extension does not affect any other deadlines scheduled in this matter. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES that, subject to the Court's approval, the claim construction deadlines be extended as outlined in the chart be extended as requested. Dated: March 18, 2011 22 23 24 25 THE SIMON LAW FIRM, P.C. By: /s/ Timothy E. Grochocinski Timothy E. Grochocinski teg@simonlawpc.com Dated: March 18,2011 WElL, GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP By: /s/ Andrew Perito Andrew Perito Andrew.perito@weil.com CASE NO. C 0901550 JSW 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED) ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES 2 1 2 Dated: 3 4 March 18,2011 DUANE MORRIS, LLP By: /s/ Stephen H. Sutro Stephen H. Sutro shsutro@duanemorris.com 5 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 6 I, Timothy E. Grochocinski, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 7 8 obtained from the other signatory. In compliance with General Order 45, paragraph X.B., I 9 10 11 12 13 hereby attest that Andrew Perito and Stephen H. Sutro have concurred in this filing. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. March 18, 2011. By: /s/ Timothy E. Grochocinski Timothy E. Grochocinski Executed on 14 15 16 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing was served on all parties of record via the Court's CMlECF system on March 18,2011. /s/ Timothy E. Grochocinski Timothy E. Grochocinski 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. C 0901 sso JSW JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED[ ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES 3 1 2 3 4 5 CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case No. C 09-01550 JSW Plaintiff and Counterc1aimDefendant, v. [PROPOSED] ORDER HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE 6 7 8 TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC and MARGALLA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendants, Counterc1aimPlaintiffs and Third Party Plaintiff, 9 10 11 12 v. PROCTOR & GAMBLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al. Third Party Defendants. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Pursuant to the foregoing Joint Stipulation and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED that the one week extension of the claim construction deadlines as outlined below are GRANTED. 22 23 24 25 Parties' regarding the terms to be construed by the Court Filing ofJoint ,",UUUi Construction Statement and Prehearing Statement pursuant Pat. L.R. 4-3 Exchange of expert reports on Claim Construction March 25, 2011 April 1, 2011 25,2011 April 1, 2011 26 27 28 March 18, _ Dated: _ _ _ _2011 Jeffrey S. White U.S. District Judge JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED[ ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES CASE NO. C 09-01550 JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?