Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Teleconference Systems, LLC et al

Filing 40

ORDER Granting 39 Stipulation as Modified re Briefing Schedule and Hearing. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on July 1, 2009. (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-01550-JSW Document39-1 Filed06/30/09 Page1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104759) matthew.powers@weil.com EDWARD R. REINES (Bar No. 135960) edward.reines@weil.com SONAL N. MEHTA (Bar No. 222086) sonal.mehta@weil.com RIP FINST (Bar No. 234478) rip.finst@weil.com WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 Attorneys for Plaintiff CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC and MARGALLA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendants. Case No. C 09-01550 JSW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR CISCO'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION Hon. Jeffrey S. White Having reviewed the parties' Stipulation To Enlarge Time For Cisco's Response To Defendants' Motions To Dismiss For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction And Subject Matter Jurisdiction, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' Stipulation is GRANTED. Cisco's responsive briefs shall be filed no later than September 1, 2009 and that defendants' reply briefs shall be filed no later than September 11, 2009, pursuant to this Court's Local Rules and Orders regarding electronic filing. The hearing is CONTINUED to September 25, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. SO ORDERED. July 1 Dated: __________________, 2009 ____________________________________ The Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge [Proposed] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME US_ACTIVE:\43057370\01\43057370_1.DOC\35826.0055

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?