Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Teleconference Systems, LLC et al

Filing 70

ORDER GRANTING 69 Stipulation REGARDING MOTION HEARINGS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/11/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-01550-JSW Document69 Filed09/10/09 Page1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANTHONY G. SIMON, Mo. Bar No. 38745 (pro hac vice) TIMOTHY E. GROCHOCINSKI, Mo. Bar No. 59607 (pro hac vice) The Simon Law Firm, P.C. 701 Market Street, Suite 1450 Saint Louis, Missouri 63101 Phone: (314) 241-2929 Fax: (314) 241-2029 asimon@simonlawpc.com teg@simonlawpc.com Attorneys for Defendants MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104795) matthew.powes@weil.com EDWARD R. REINES (Bar No. 135960) edward.reines@weil.com SONAL N. MEHTA (Bar No. 222086) sonal.mehta@weil.com RIP FINST (Bar No. 234478) rip.finst@weil.com WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 Attorneys for Plaintiff CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC and MARGALLA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendants. Case No. C 09-01550 JSW JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MOTION HEARINGS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Hon. Jeffrey S. White JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MOTION HEARINGS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C 09-01550 JSW Case3:09-cv-01550-JSW Document69 Filed09/10/09 Page2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREFORE, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and Civil L. R. 16-10, this Court ordered that the Case Management Conference in this case shall be held on August 28, 2009 (D.I. 11); WHEREFORE, the Court's July 1, 2009 Order Granting Stipulation To Enlarge Time For Cisco's Response To Defendants' Motions To Dismiss For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction And Subject Matter Jurisdiction ("Motions to Dismiss") set the hearing regarding those motions on September 25, 2009 at 9:00 am (D.I. 40); WHEREFORE, pursuant to the parties' joint stipulation, the Court rescheduled the Case Management Conference to the same date as that of the hearing on the Motions to Dismiss, September 25, at 1:30 pm (D.I. 50); WHEREFORE, pursuant to the parties' subsequent joint stipulation of August 31, 2009, Defendant Teleconference Systems, LLC withdrew its Motion to Dismiss For Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (D.I. 58); WHEREFORE, on the same day, Defendants filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss, Stay or in the Alternative Transfer to the District of Delaware (D.I. 56); WHEREFORE, the Court has set the hearing on Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss, Stay or Transfer and on the remaining Motion to Dismiss for October 16, 2009 (D.I. 61); WHEREFORE, the parties believe that it may be most convenient and productive for the Court and for the parties to schedule the remaining hearings and Case Management Conference on the same day so that the Court may address these open issues at once; and WHEREFORE, counsel for the plaintiff has a scheduling conflict on October 16, 2009. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN THE PARTIES that, subject to the Court's approval, the hearing on Margalla's Motion to Dismiss For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and on the Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss, Stay or in the Alternative Transfer to the District of Delaware shall be held on October 30, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. The briefing schedule for the Defendants' joint motion shall remain unchanged. It is further stipulated that the Case Management Conference in this case shall be held on October 30, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MOTION HEARINGS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 Case No. C 09-01550 JSW Case3:09-cv-01550-JSW Document69 Filed09/10/09 Page3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 10, 2009 THE SIMON LAW FIRM, P.C. By: /s/ Anthony G. Simon______________ ANTHONY G. SIMON asimon@simonlawpc.com Attorneys for Defendants Dated: September 10, 2009 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP By: /s/ Edward R. Reines EDWARD R. REINES edward.reines@weil.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc. FILER'S ATTESTATION I, Edward R. Reines, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Joint Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, paragraph X.B., I hereby attest that Anthony Simon has concurred in this filing. Dated: September 10, 2009 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP By: /s/ Edward R. Reines EDWARD R. REINES edward.reines@weil.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc. JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MOTION HEARINGS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 2 Case No. C 09-01550 JSW Case3:09-cv-01550-JSW Document69 Filed09/10/09 Page4 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: _______________ September 11, 2009 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the hearing on Margalla's Motion to Dismiss For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and on the Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss, Stay or in the Alternative Transfer to the District of Delaware shall be held on October 30, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. The briefing schedule for the Defendants' joint motion shall remain unchanged. It is further ordered that the Case Management Conference in this case shall be held on October 30, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. _______________________________ JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MOTION HEARINGS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 3 Case No. C 09-01550 JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?