Napoto v. DHL Express (USA) Inc. et al

Filing 39

ORDER GRANTING 38 Stipulation OF DISMISSAL OF DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC., DHL GLOBAL CUSTOMER SOLUTIONS (USA), INC., DHL INFORMATION SERVICES (AMERICAS), INC., DHL SOLUTIONS (USA), INC. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/10/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2009)

Case3:09-cv-01551-JSW Document38-1

Filed07/31/09 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PETER M. HART (State Bar No. 198691) LAW OFFICES OF PETER M. HART 13952 Bora Bora Way, F-320 Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] LARRY W. LEE (State Bar No. 228175) DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, A Professional Corporation 444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1370 Los Angeles, California 90071 [phone] [phone] facsimile [e-mail] KENNETH H. YOON (State Bar No. 198443) LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH H. YOON One Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2200 Los Angeles, CA 90017 [phone] [phone] facsimile [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff Taina Naupoto UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TAINA NAPOTO, as an individual and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC., an Ohio corporation; DHL GLOBAL CUSTOMER SOLUTIONS (USA), INC., an Ohio corporation; DHL INFORMATION SERVICES (AMERICAS), INC., an Ohio corporation; DHL SOLUTIONS (USA), INC., an Ohio corporation and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO.: 09-CV-01551 JSW [PROPOSED] ORDER

[PROPOSED] ORDER (09-CV-01551 JSW)

-1-

Case3:09-cv-01551-JSW Document38-1

Filed07/31/09 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 10, 2009 _________________ IT IS SO ORDERED.

ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC., DHL GLOBAL CUSTOMER

SOLUTIONS (USA), INC., DHL INFORMATION SERVICES (AMERICAS), INC., and DHL SOLUTIONS (USA), INC. are dismissed without prejudice from the First Amended Complaint; 2. Plaintiffs and all Defendants shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees in

connection with the dismissal of Defendants DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC., DHL GLOBAL CUSTOMER SOLUTIONS (USA), INC., DHL INFORMATION SERVICES (AMERICAS), INC., and DHL SOLUTIONS (USA), INC.; 3. The Motion for Summary Judgment presently set for Friday, September 25,

2009 at 9:00 am is off-calendar without prejudice to Defendants refiling; 4. The discovery schedule set forth in this Court's ORDER CONVERTING IN

PART MOTION TO DISMISS TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESERVING RULING AND GRANTING IN PART REMAINDER OF MOTION TO DISMISS dated July 2, 2009, is vacated as moot.

____________________________________ Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge

[PROPOSED] ORDER (09-CV-01551 JSW)

-2-