Napoto v. DHL Express (USA) Inc. et al

Filing 46

ORDER GRANTING 44 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/21/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2009)

Case3:09-cv-01551-JSW Document44

Filed09/11/09 Page1 of 2
Clear Form

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Taina Napoto

CASE NO. 09-CV-01551 JSW Plaintiff(s), v.
DHL Express (USA), Inc., et al.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
David Rotman of Gregorio, Haldeman, Piazza, Rotman, Frank & Feder

_____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9
Feb. 26, 2009 per request of Defendants. other requested deadline _____________________________________________

9/ ____ Dated:__11/09 _____

/ _ ___ M. ___ _s/ _Peter___Hart ________________ Attorney for Plaintiff / _ ______J. Rao _s/ _Anthony ___________________ Attorney for Defendant

9/ ____ Dated:__11/09 ______

Case3:09-cv-01551-JSW Document44

Filed09/11/09 Page2 of 2

E When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket vent, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation." [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 9 Mediation 9 Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 9 90 days from the date of this order. Feb. 26, 2009 9 other ___________________ The Court assumes a typographical error by the parties, which also is reflected in their case management statement. The deadline to complete IT IS SO ORDERED. ADR shall be February 26, 2010.
Sep embe___ 2009 Dated:___t____r 21,______

___________________________________ Jeffrey S. White UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE