Napoto v. DHL Express (USA) Inc. et al

Filing 57

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge James Larson on 8/31/10. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2010)

Download PDF
Napoto v. DHL Express (USA) Inc. et al Doc. 57 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California TAINA NAPOTO, Plaintiff, v. DANZAS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. ________________________________/ No. C 09-1551 JL ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [Reassigned Case] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: The above matter having been reassigned to the Honorable James Larson for trial and all further proceedings, it is hereby ordered, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 16(b) and Civil L.R. 16-10, that a Case Management Conference shall be held in this case on Wednesday, October 13, 2010, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, U.S. District Court 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The parties shall appear in person or through counsel and shall be prepared to discuss all items referred to in Civil L.R. 16-10. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9, the parties shall file a joint case management statement and proposed order no later than ten (10) days before the date of the conference. If any party is proceeding without counsel, separate statements may be filed by each party. G:\JLALL\CASES\CIVIL\09-1551\ReassignCMC.wpd 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 All documents filed with the Clerk of the Court shall list the civil case number followed only by the initials "JL." One copy shall be clearly marked as a chambers copy. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 31, 2010 __________________________________ James Larson United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\JLALL\CASES\CIVIL\09-1551\ReassignCMC.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?