Paglia et al v. Emeritus Corporation

Filing 21

ORDER of Dismissal with prejudice. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-01582-SI Document20 Filed11/17/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Kathleen Maylin (SBN 155371) Maylink@jacksonlewis.com Rebecca Benhuri (SBN 209443) Benhurir@jacksonlewis.com JACKSON LEWIS LLP 199 Fremont Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 394-9400 Facsimile: (415) 394-9401 Attorneys for Defendant EMERITUS CORPORATION Paul B. Justi (SBN 124727) pbjusti@comcast.net Juniper Bacon (SBN 256687) juniper@pbjusti.com LAW OFFICES OF PAUL B. JUSTI 1981 North Broadway, Suite 250 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 256 7900 Facsimile: (925) 256 9204 Attorneys for Plaintiffs LISA PAGLIA, DOROTHY TING and KATHIE CALLANTINE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LISA PAGLIA, DOROTHY TING and KATHIE CALLANTINE, Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:09-cv-01582-SI STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 21 v. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// 1 STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EMERITUS CORPORATION, a business entity, and DOES 1 THROUGH 25, inclusive, Defendants. Complaint Filed: March 12, 2009; Contra Costa Superior Court Removed: April 10, 2009 Case No. 3:09-cv-01582-SI Case3:09-cv-01582-SI Document20 Filed11/17/09 Page2 of 3 Case3:09-cv-01582-SI Document20 Filed11/17/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: [PROPOSED] ORDER Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties, the Court orders as follows: GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, and pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, Case No. 3:09-cv-01582-SI is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. The Honorable SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Court Judge 3 STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:09-cv-01582-SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?