Kema, Inc et al v. Koperwhats et al

Filing 126

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' REQUESTS REGARDING ATTENDANCE AT MEDIATION AND FOR SANCTIONS. Signed by Judge Laporte on 3/8/10. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California San Francisco Division KEMA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. WILLIAM KOPERWHATS, et al., Defendants. _____________________________________/ And related counterclaims. _____________________________________/ No. C 09-1587 MMC MED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' REQUESTS REGARDING ATTENDANCE AT MEDIATION AND FOR SANCTIONS 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants' request for an order requiring personal attendance by Counterclaim defendants Puckett, Axmor Software America, and KEMA USA at the mediation scheduled for March 23, 2010, is DENIED. The ADR Magistrate Judge will not order personal attendance by a party or a party representative at mediation until after the assigned judge rules on disputes related to the court's personal jurisdiction over that party. Parties may, of course, voluntarily agree to participate in the court's mediation process during the pendency of disputes concerning personal jurisdiction. Defendants' request for an order requiring personal attendance at the mediation by nonattorney corporate representatives of KEMA, Inc. and RLW Analytics is DENIED. The client representative identified by these parties shall appear in person. In addition, an appropriate non// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California attorney corporate representative shall participate by telephone throughout the mediation. Defendants' request for sanctions is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. March 8, 2010 Dated By: Elizabeth D. Laporte United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?