Kema, Inc et al v. Koperwhats et al

Filing 141

ORDER ON STIPULATED MISC. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE DATE. Continuing Status Conference from May 14, 2010 to July 9, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 10, 2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2010).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LINDA M. MACLEOD, ESQ. [SBN 142023] MORGAN, FRANICH, FREDKIN & MARSH 99 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 1000 San Jose, California 95113 1613 Telephone:(408) 288 8288 Facsimile: (408) 288 8325 Attorneys for Specially Appearing AXMOR SOFTWARE-AMERICA, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KEMA, INC., a Virginia Corporation, and RLW ANALYTICS, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. WILLIAM KOPERWHATS and MILOSLICK SCIENTIFIC, LLC, Defendants. WILLIAM KOPERWHATS, an individual, Counterclaim Plaintiffs, vs. KEMA, INC., a Virginia Corporation, KEMA, USA, a Pennsylvania Corporation; RLW ANALYTICS, INC., a California Corporation, Axmor Software-America, Inc., a Texas Corporation, and Curt D. Puckett, an individual, Counterclaim Defendants. STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants KEMA, Inc. and RLW Analytics, Inc., Specially-Appearing Counter-Defendants KEMA USA, Inc. and Curt Puckett, Defendant and Counter-Claimant William Koperwhats, Defendant MiloSlick Scientific, and Specially-Appearing Counter-Defendant Axmor-Software America, Inc. 1 Stipulated Misc. Administrative Request and [Proposed] Order Continuing Status Conference Date Case No. C09 01587 STIPULATED MISC. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE DATE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 request that the Court continue the Status Conference currently set for May 14, 2010 to June 4, 2010. The reason for this request is that on June 4, 2010, the Court is already scheduled to hear Koperwhats' Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint at 9:00 a.m. Holding both the hearing and the status conference on June 4, 2010 will lessen the travel time and expense of counsel. It is also possible that the Court's rulings on Koperwhats' motion and the two Motions to Dismiss the Second Amended Counterclaims (set for hearing on May 28, 2010) may have an impact on the matters to be addressed at the Status Conference. STIPULATION WHEREAS the parties have motions to dismiss set for hearing on May 28, 2010 and June 4, 2010 that may have an impact on the issues addressed at the Status Conference currently set for May 14, 2010; NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate that the Status Conference be continued from May 14, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. to June 4, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. Dated: May 5, 2010 MORGAN, FRANICH, FREDKIN & MARSH /s/ Linda M. MacLeod By: Linda M. MacLeod Attorneys for Specially Appearing Axmor Software-America, Inc. Dated: May 5, 2010 MANDEL & ADRIANO /s/ SaraLynn Mandel By: SARALYNN MANDEL Attorneys for Defendants Dated: May 5, 2010 GCA LAW PARTNERSHIP LLP /s/ Valerie M. Wagner By: VALERIE M. WAGNER Attorneys for KEMA, Inc., KEMA USA, RLW Analytics, Inc., and Curt Puckett 2 Stipulated Misc. Administrative Request and [Proposed] Order Continuing Status Conference Date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulated Misc. Administrative Request and [Proposed] Order Continuing Status Conference Date ORDER This Court, having reviewed this Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing July 9, therefore, orders that the Status Conference be continued from May 14, 2010 to June 4, July 2, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. An updated Conference Statement shall be filed no later than May 28, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 10, 2010 Honorable Judge Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?