Kema, Inc et al v. Koperwhats et al

Filing 146

ORDER VACATING MAY 28, 2010 HEARINGS ON KEMA DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS AND AXMOR'S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 26, 2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is counterclaim defendant KEMA USA, Inc., counterclaim defendant KEMA, Inc., counterclaim defendant RLW Analytics, Inc., and counterclaim defendant Curt Puckett's (collectively "KEMA Defendants") joint Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Second Amended Counterclaims, filed April 23, 2010. Counterclaim plaintiff William Koperwhats ("Koperwhats") has filed opposition, to which KEMA Defendants have replied. Also before the Court is counterclaim defendant Axmor Software-America, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Counterclaims, filed April 23, 2010. Koperwhats has filed opposition to which Axmor has replied. // // // // AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. United States District Court KEMA, INC., et al., v. Plaintiffs, No. C-09-1587 MMC ORDER VACATING MAY 28, 2010 HEARINGS ON KEMA DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS AND AXMOR'S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIAM KOPERWHATS, et al., Defendants, / 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motions, the Court deems the matters appropriate for determination on the parties' written submissions, and hereby VACATES the hearing scheduled for May 28, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 26, 2010 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?