Kema, Inc et al v. Koperwhats et al

Filing 165

ORDER DENYING 164 PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 29, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2010)

Kema, Inc et al v. Koperwhats et al

Doc. 165

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is plaintiffs' "Unopposed Administrative Motion to Shorten Time for Hearing on Motion to Strike Defendants' Motion to Dismiss And Strike Second Amended Complaint," filed October 28, 2010, whereby plaintiffs seek to set a shortened briefing and hearing schedule on a motion to strike defendants' motion to dismiss, on the ground defendants' motion was not timely filed. Good cause not having been shown, plaintiffs' motion is hereby DENIED. Plaintiffs may either (1) file a regularly noticed motion to strike or (2) include any arguments related to the timeliness of defendants' motion to dismiss in their opposition thereto. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 29, 2010 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge v. WILLIAM KOPERWHATS and MILOSLICK SCIENTIFIC, LLC. Defendants. / United States District Court KEMA, INC., a Virginia Corporation, and RLW ANALYTICS, INC., a California Corporation Plaintiffs, No. C-09-1587 MMC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Dockets.Justia.com